[Eclipsedotnet-developers] .NET 1.1 vs .NET 2.0 again

[Kunle O. <kun...@vi...>]

Hi,

I think I've had a change of heart on this. I still agree that the
availability of .NET 2.0 and Visual Studio 2005 C# Express, and the fact
that .NET 2.0 and .NET 1.1 can co-exist on a machine is evidence that a =
.NET
2.0-only restriction isn't particularly onerous.

Nevertheless, I'm uneasy because nothing in the platform *needs* .NET =
2.0
features. VS.NET 2005 (including C# Express) is a CPU/RAM/DISK hog. Some
people might prefer the leaner VS.NET 2003 unless the newer version adds
real value. I'm not sure that it does in this case.

Anyways, just my 2=A2...


Kunle