Re: [eclipsedarcs-develop] darcs get failure from eclipsedarcs repo

[Leif F. <lei...@go...>]

Hi Hubert,

Thanks a lot,
>
> darcs get --partial --verbose http://...
>
> works all right.
> Very fast - I am impressed.


:-)


Also simple "darcs get" went past patch 37 this morning.
> Killed it myself at patch 100 or so, since my patience was up.
>
> Anyway, a rather strange message:
> libcurl: HTTP error (404?).
>
> What puzzles me is the question mark.
> Obviously libcurl or some other module higher up was doing some guesswork=
.
> Under normal conditions a 404 error and a timeout, say, should be easy to
> tell apart. Right?

Indeed. I'd have to speculate what happens here. I would guess, from the
message, that it comes from libcurl. But as you said, libcurl should be abl=
e
to be more specific. So either the message comes actually from the code tha=
t
calls it (called it, was interrupted by the kill, didn't know what the
problem was, and wrote that message as if on behalf of libcurl), or
(assuming you're on Windows) this has to do with the version of libcurl tha=
t
was linked in (cygwin?, ...). Generally, Darcs seems to have a few rough
edges on Windows, there are several things that don't really run smoothly.

Thanks && ciao,
Leif

Thanks again,
> Hubert
>
>
>
> > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: ecl...@li...
> > [mailto:ecl...@li...] Im Auftrag
> von
> > Radoslaw Grzanka
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. M=E4rz 2007 14:22
> > An: ecl...@li...
> > Betreff: Re: [eclipsedarcs-develop] darcs get failure from eclipsedarcs
> > repo
> >
> > 2007/3/15, Kauker, Hubert <Hub...@tr...>:
> > > Hello...
> > >
> > > Did a darcs get from the command line.
> > > Got the following failure:
> > >
> > > Copying patch 37 of 332:
> > > 20060509235042-159cd-d8ceb161114b978ceb5df057ecb83bd0a5
> > > 48097b.gz
> > >
> >
> > I have managed to get the repo from sf.net today with no problem.
> > However, earlier this morning I had problems with transfers from
> > sf.net. Maybe it was related? Anyway, simply try again.
> >
> > Also, try with --partial. Much faster.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >   Radek.
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> > your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> >
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D=
DEVDEV
> > _______________________________________________
> > eclipsedarcs-develop mailing list
> > ecl...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipsedarcs-develop
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D=
DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> eclipsedarcs-develop mailing list
> ecl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipsedarcs-develop
>



--=20
Leif Frenzel
http://leiffrenzel.de
http://cohatoe.blogspot.com