...just two cents from one happy ECB-user - not an ECB-dev, but a dev
otherwise - who has worked with both, CVS (sort of "worked") and Git:
Am Donnerstag 07 November 2013, um 18:05:45 schrieb Alex Ott:
> HI RyanThat should be just one more good reason for dropping CVS in favour
> please, merge the changes from my repo - I made many changes since April,
> and also included changes from other people... My repo now is used for ECB
> on MELPA...
of Git. No work on ECB should be lost, which is just easier to handle
with Git than it is with CVS.
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Ryan Ware <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > I would also like to get some feedback from the ecb community on if theyGiven the fact that SourceForge is no longer the organization it used
> > prefer the current SourceForge Site or would consider moving to a Github
> > site. Regardless, I want to ensure we move to git from cvs.
to be, and given that moving Git repos from here to there is cheap,
I'm all in for an Alternative to SF (caution: that's just my personal
preference and as said I'm no ECB-dev, so formally I don't have a voice
kernel concepts GmbH Tel: +49-271-771091-11
Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48