From: Liam M. <lm...@WP...> - 2004-11-12 01:20:08
|
Right, just for debugging. We might not really need the Log4E plug-in in any case, a pretty simple logger class is included in Quality Eclipse book... I was just throwing it out there. Liam Gary Pollice wrote: >So, why do you need logging? Is it for tracking down problems? > >-----Original Message----- >From: ebo...@li... >[mailto:ebo...@li...] On Behalf Of Liam >Morley >Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 4:07 PM >To: ebo...@li... >Subject: [EBOB-DISCUSSION] organizational questions > >As far as organization and environment is concerned- do we want to settle on >Eclipse 3.0? I vote yes. > >Other *suggestions* that are completely and totally open for discussion: > >Eclipse Plug-ins that I use (and maybe you should too?): > > * GEF SDK 3.0.1 (can be downloaded through Help> > * JDocSearch 0.0.3 http://www.jdocs.com/plugins/eclipse/index.html > (for searching through Open Source APIs) > * Log4E 0.7.6 http://log4e.jayefem.de/index.php/Main_Page (haven't > really investigated this, but it's designed to make logging easier) > * Any others? > >Use Cases >http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=697946&group_id=123169&func=browse >I've just recently created a new tracker at SourceForge for use cases. I >didn't know you could create your own trackers until now.. we could create >new trackers for other things (like user stories) if we wanted to. As it is, >we can connect features to use cases and vice versa. >Unfortunately this is one-way linking- we can tell that use case UC1 >addresses feature F1, but we'd also need to edit F1 to say that it's >addressed by UC1. (Instead of being called F1, SF gives everything unique >numbers.) > >Features >http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=695629&group_id=123169&func=browse >I've updated the features list on here, it's more or less up-to-date. If I'm >missing anything, feel free to add it. > >Bugs http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=695626&group_id=123169&func=browse > >Discussion: >mailing lists: > > * General discussion ebo...@li... (all > three of us, open list) > * Development discussion ebo...@li... (just > Justin and I) > >It seems weird to have a mailing list with just two people- the reason I >made it was because the list gets archived. This will help if we ever need >to go back and talk about a decision we made months prior over email. > >Developer Documentation: >http://sourceforge.net/docman/?group_id=123169 Our vision is already here. >We might want to discuss what documents we feel are necessary to write; do >we need a software architecture document, etc., or will use cases (which >already have a tracker) be sufficient? > >User Documentation: >We could keep some user documentation in the same place (under a different >category) if necessary, but generally we should be able to keep everything >within the Eclipse Help system. > >What's left (discussion points)? >A calendar to keep track of iterations and help plan? Should the Dashboard >software be used as a group, or should we use it on a more individual level? > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: >Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's >Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click >_______________________________________________ >Ebob-discussion mailing list >Ebo...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ebob-discussion > > > > > > |