Re: [Easyh10-devel] EasyH10 1.0 RC 1

[Benjamin S. <ast...@dl...>]

nyaochi wrote:

>>Would it be possible/have you considered having the official version as
>>1.0.0 instead of 1.0? Reasons:
>>
>>* Bugfixes could be increments of the minor revision (1.0.1, 1.0.2, etc)
>>while adding features could bump the major revision (1.1.x, 1.2.x..)
>>* The above makes it easier to keep track of versions
>>* I screwed up, current version in debian is 1.0b7-1, and 1.0-1 <
>>1.0b7-1 < 1.0.0-1 so if it's 1.0 i'd either change the number for debian
>>or do it as 1.0final-1.
>>    
>>
>I thought version numbers should be 1.0 (released with confidence) ->
>1.0.1 (but found minor bugs) -> 1.0.2. I don't like 1.0.0 because it
>presumably says there will be a bug-fix release in the future. But I
>understand the situation of "1.0b7-1 > 1.0", so I don't mind releasing
>1.0 as 1.0.0.
>
>Nyaochi
>  
>
I think it depends on the convention you use (there are several) and
should just be consistant. Either way works, I can do something fun with
the debian version (1.0final) or something. They need that ~ operator!
It's up to you