[Dynapyide-developer] Re: messages

[<mos...@cr...>]

>I have problems with this email account, Yahoo now
>does not provide free POP3 access, so I've moved to
>another provider. How can I change my mail in the
>list?? My new e-mail is: jav...@ho...

Stop using Yahoo and subscribe to the list from your other address. who cares if your yahoo account reaches its limits with unread messages if youre not using it anyway.


>Not necesserily...  EJB and .NET are component
>architectures, but not really adapted to desktop
>applications. I'm more leaned towards using the Apache
>Avalon myself, even if it is suggested not so suitable
>for client-only GUI applications either.

I think that we could pretty much figure out a very simple client(desktop)-side component architecture more or less compliant with Avalon. That would probably be the best option. Take the best of both worlds.

>However, I'm more or less sketching an architecture,
>where the presentation layer is totally separate from
>the system which consists of a manager layer - that is
>the presentation layers interface - and the handler
>layer - which is the core functionality. I'm not sure
>we need to stretch the CDB to cover the whole GUI to,
>and besides that it's nice to make possible for
>different GUI techniques - SWING, clientside and
>serverside alike.

I have been doing some thinking on this, and what I came up with was to create a simple text-pad with javascript colorizing and a plugin module. From there on, the visual designer, JS interpreter, etc could be simple components stacked on top od each other. We could probably use a large chunc of Jedit code to do the core, then the rest would be far easier.

>I've also taken up contact with a guy, running his own
>SF project for a MVC framework in java. Posssible a
>collaboration with him might lead to our own
>soloution.

Where?

>Other than that I haven't excluded any of the
>javacompatible frameworks as of yet, but I'm pretty
>sure it won't be .NET or JavaBeans (EJB is a better
>option in that case).
>
>BTW I thought it was you who answered up on the that
>we should go with our own COP technique. So far your
>answers leads since nobody else has answered yet ;)
>
see above.

>Henrik 
>
>



BTW, sorry if this is a bit late and/or i haven't read any posts after this, I haven't picked up my email in a couple of days now.

David

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/CC/IT/L/MU/P/S/AT d? s++: a-- C+++ U--- P+ L E-- W+++ N++ o+ K? w+++ 
O? M V? PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP- t+ 5 X+ R tv+ b+++ DI+++ D G e++ h! r y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------



--
Personalised email by http://another.com