|
From: <mos...@cr...> - 2002-05-07 09:02:15
|
>I have problems with this email account, Yahoo now >does not provide free POP3 access, so I've moved to >another provider. How can I change my mail in the >list?? My new e-mail is: jav...@ho... Stop using Yahoo and subscribe to the list from your other address. who cares if your yahoo account reaches its limits with unread messages if youre not using it anyway. >Not necesserily... EJB and .NET are component >architectures, but not really adapted to desktop >applications. I'm more leaned towards using the Apache >Avalon myself, even if it is suggested not so suitable >for client-only GUI applications either. I think that we could pretty much figure out a very simple client(desktop)-side component architecture more or less compliant with Avalon. That would probably be the best option. Take the best of both worlds. >However, I'm more or less sketching an architecture, >where the presentation layer is totally separate from >the system which consists of a manager layer - that is >the presentation layers interface - and the handler >layer - which is the core functionality. I'm not sure >we need to stretch the CDB to cover the whole GUI to, >and besides that it's nice to make possible for >different GUI techniques - SWING, clientside and >serverside alike. I have been doing some thinking on this, and what I came up with was to create a simple text-pad with javascript colorizing and a plugin module. From there on, the visual designer, JS interpreter, etc could be simple components stacked on top od each other. We could probably use a large chunc of Jedit code to do the core, then the rest would be far easier. >I've also taken up contact with a guy, running his own >SF project for a MVC framework in java. Posssible a >collaboration with him might lead to our own >soloution. Where? >Other than that I haven't excluded any of the >javacompatible frameworks as of yet, but I'm pretty >sure it won't be .NET or JavaBeans (EJB is a better >option in that case). > >BTW I thought it was you who answered up on the that >we should go with our own COP technique. So far your >answers leads since nobody else has answered yet ;) > see above. >Henrik > > BTW, sorry if this is a bit late and/or i haven't read any posts after this, I haven't picked up my email in a couple of days now. David -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/CC/IT/L/MU/P/S/AT d? s++: a-- C+++ U--- P+ L E-- W+++ N++ o+ K? w+++ O? M V? PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP- t+ 5 X+ R tv+ b+++ DI+++ D G e++ h! r y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ -- Personalised email by http://another.com |