From: Pascal B. <pa...@dy...> - 2001-02-25 10:32:26
|
extra code (size is also an issue with javascript) to be rude: these things have all been discussed many times in the last year.. and we (including Dan back then) decided that this was just the most straight forward way of doing the inheriting (and widgets SHOULD inherit from dynlayer for should be obvious reasons) The way you want to do this is just adding work arounds for something that can be done using build in Javascript ideas. There was one WidgetObject once that did it in the same way as you'r suggesting (all widgets inherited from this object and it had a set of functions that simple call the correct dynlayer function) but this is alot of overhead and extra code, making things slower, use more memory, and bigger... Pascal Bestebroer pa...@dy... http://www.dynamic-core.net > A wrapper function would be added to myWidget that would look like this: > myWidget.prototype.moveTo = function(x,y){ > this.dynlayer.moveto(x,y); > } > > 8an |