Re[2]: [Dynapi-Dev] a few hours for only 2 lines of code.. damn!

[Robert R. <rra...@ya...>]

As much as I liked DynAPI 1, I don't want to go back to those days :)

I think the widget model as it is now, is much more extensible than by
not using any type of inheriting.

-- 
// Robert Rainwater

On 2/25/2001, 3:48:41 AM EST, Pascal wrote about "[Dynapi-Dev] a few hours for only 2 lines of code.. damn!":

> man, now your gonna get it :)

> leave the inheriting model alone!

> serious though, currently widgets really inherit from the dynlayer, so that
> all dynlayer methods are available without any extra code (or memory)

> if you make it a property of the widget, all these things are gone and you
> would need to call the dynlayer property to access dynlayer functionality
> (sizing,moveto) which should be simple widget methods.

> I think there has been already ALOT of discussion about this (see archives
> :) and I for one am against any widget model changes (always have been,
> always will :)


> Pascal Bestebroer
> pa...@dy...
> http://www.dynamic-core.net

>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> Van: dyn...@li...
>> [mailto:dyn...@li...]Namens Eytan Heidingsfeld
>> Verzonden: zaterdag 24 februari 2001 23:02
>> Aan: dyn...@li...
>> Onderwerp: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] a few hours for only 2 lines of code.. damn!
>>
>>
>> The only thing I still want to change is the way that all widgets inherit
>> from DynLayer. Why don't we just make them have a dynlayer object
>> then it is
>> easier to free mem. (Taking care of DynLayer is a hassle but the object
>> isn't).
>> 8an
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
>> Dyn...@li...
>> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
>>


> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> Dyn...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev


----------------------
DynAPI Snapshots: http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/snapshot/
DynAPI Homepage: http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/