From: Doug M. <do...@cr...> - 2001-02-23 19:44:05
|
uh, oh. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Raymond Smith" <dst...@or...> To: <dyn...@li...> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 11:33 AM Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI current things > M$ paid Sun 20 million dollars as a legal settlement in a lawsuit they lost. > Here, read this. It's from Business News. > > As a result of the settlement, Redmond, Wash.-based Microsoft will pay $20 > million to Palo Alto, Calif.-based Sun, .terminate all Java licenses, and > agree to a permanent injunction against the use of the Java Compatible logo. > > "They can continue to distribute an outdated version of our technology, but > they can't use Java for .NET," said Patricia Sueltz, Sun's executive vice > president, Software Systems Group. .NET is Microsoft's Internet applications > strategy. > > What Microsoft can continue doing, under a limited license, is sell existing > inventory of products, only with the 1.1.4 implementation of Java that > Microsoft currently has, but the company cannot modify those implementations > at all, Sueltz added. > > The limited license covers only the products already containing the Java > technology, and lasts only for seven years. Beyond that, Microsoft has no > rights to distribute the Java technology, or to otherwise use any of Sun's > intellectual property, Sun said. > > A couple of key takeaways: > > Can't use Java for .NET and can only distribute it with "existing inventory > of products". Whistler isn't this! > > Ray > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Doug Melvin" <do...@cr...> > To: <dyn...@li...> > Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 2:04 PM > Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI current things > > > > Actually, MS just paid Sun 20 million dollars to licence java for their > own > > use. > > I don't think we need to worry about there being no Java support in IE6. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Raymond Smith" <dst...@or...> > > To: <dyn...@li...> > > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 2:16 PM > > Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI current things > > > > > > > The only thing that concerns me, is our friends over at Microsoft. > While > > > they were moving towards DOM compliance (around the time they ported IE5 > > to > > > the Macintosh) they took a hard left with IE5.5 when they decided that > war > > > with the Java/Unix camp was inevitable. > > > > > > I have a lot of concerns with the pending Whistler/IE6 combination, > > because > > > I am pretty sure it's going be a major paradigm shift for them/us (think > > > zero support for client side Java). M$ is moving to align all their > > > products OS/Software around the .net strategy while at the same time > > pushing > > > the "disturbance factor" in other alternative platforms (hmmmm, this > > seems > > > to run like shit on my PC compared to 100% M$ products) as much as they > > can > > > without flagging the Justice Department "to much". > > > > > > Additionally, the long awaited arrival of NS6 came and went without so > > much > > > as a ripple of real impact. I think that good old Netscape finally > found > > > out how to align the bullet-filled cylinder of business blunders with > > their > > > head. NS6 is a dead alternative in the eyes of Joe Consumer. I can't > > even > > > imagine AOL wrapping there consumer online service around this browser > > > instead of IE (that they use now), unless they want to hand MSN > > > marketshare. > > > > > > In no way am I supporting an IE concentric approach. We just need to be > > > aware that "shit is gonna hit the developer fan" in 3-7 months when they > > > release Whistler. They have spent a billion dollars developing this > > release > > > with two goals in mind. Stunt the growth of Java and kill Linux as a > > viable > > > "consumer OS" alternative. By consumer OS I mean our average home PC > > user. > > > > > > A scary fact is that M$ has said they don't plan on releasing IE6 as a > > > public beta. It's gonna release inside the Whistler OS update. Get > > > Whistler, get IE6. This means one thing. IE6 and Whistler are being > > > developed in tandem to create strategic havoc for the Java/Unix camps. > > > > > > Javascript (the DynAPI foundation) will likely survive as a > cross-platform > > > language; it's to entrenched and strategically means little to M$'s end > > > goals. We can :O) a bit here. > > > > > > This is why I don't want to spend a lot of time developing a Java Applet > > > Client/Side I/O device for DynAPI2 Michael. I'm not even sure it will > be > > > supported with the new IE6. I think Java is going to be a server-side > > tool > > > for awhile. > > > > > > In the end, basic DOM support with the DynAPI is probably the best path. > > > But lets be smart (as we can be with limited knowledge) about how we > > enhance > > > that API with input/output shunts to the dynamic server/side world. > > > > > > Laters, > > > > > > Ray > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > > > Dyn...@li... > > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free by AVG Free Edition > > Download at: http://www.grisoft.com/html/us_index.cfm > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.231 / Virus Database: 112 - Release Date: 2/12/01 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > > Dyn...@li... > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free by AVG Free Edition Download at: http://www.grisoft.com/html/us_index.cfm Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.231 / Virus Database: 112 - Release Date: 2/12/01 |