Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI current things

[Jordi - I. - M. <jmi...@or...>]

I agree in all four points ( damm I can't remember not agreeing with Pascal, I
wonder if it is healthy ). If browsers are moving towards DOM compliance (insert
your favourite joke here) then so should the API.

I'll try to give it a shot myself this weekend. We'll see. I foresee that Eytan
will have plenty to say regarding the object structure, as well as many others.
Please do.

Quoting Richard's quote: "Don't go crazy with multiple soft levels. Keep it
simple"

Richard Bennett wrote:

> Good points overall,
> > * DOM defaults
> > All "if (is.xx) else..." statements should be changed so that the NS6 code
> > is always the default (basically, no NS6 check should be left in the
> code).
> > This should prove first steps towards support for true DOM compliant
> > browsers (they should then work for a large part)
>
> I think DOM code should always be default, tested on the latest Mozilla
> milestone, so no is.dom checks should be found, because NS6 has lots of bugs
> which might require workarounds.
>
> Richard
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pascal" <pb...@oi...>
> To: <dyn...@li...>
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 12:40 PM
> Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI current things
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> Dyn...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev