From: Doug M. <do...@cr...> - 2001-02-21 20:53:15
|
so let's say, DynAPI 2.01 ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jordi - IlMaestro - Ministral" <jmi...@or...> To: <dyn...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 1:24 AM Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Freeing Memory > Amen. However Pascal I don't think anyone pretends to redo the API. We should > blame Raymond ( as usual :) ) because he introduced the 3 in the name and made > it all look scary. > > When we're saying DynAPI3 I understand we're meaning DynAPI2 with better and > cleaner code, not a new API. > > Pascal wrote: > > > Well to get this said in time: > > > > I think that any moves towards a DynAPI3 should be on a seperate sourceforge > > project (or atleast other location). > > > > I have absolutely no interest in doing everything all over again or even > > participating in a venture like that. > > > > The DynAPI2 has been in development for little more then a year now, and we > > "made" everyone drop the dynapi1 in favour of DynAPI2 saying "dynapi1 is > > discontinued, dynapi2 will support ie55 and ns6 and other new browsers, it's > > better more flexible and you should just use it" > > > > Now you guys are thinking about doing it all over again.. this means you'r > > saying to all the users (and there are ALOT) sorry people, now you'll have > > to use this unfinished-slightly-not-100%-working version of a crossbrowser > > library because we're going to redo everything. > > > > Most people here haven't been involved with the full developing of the > > DynAPI, I can think of only 3 persons at this moment that have been > > participating in the development for this long period (and still only about > > 3-5 persons doing all the stuff: documentation, bug fixing, patches, > > administrating, etc). > > > > In one more year, alot of you will have abonded the API3 completely, leaving > > only a few guys on board.. the API will work crossbrowser partially, and not > > fully supporting the latest browsers (by that time something like versions > > 110 of those browsers and DOM20)... Seen it happen already with this code, > > don't want to redo it just to end up with the same thing. > > > > In the beginning we had clean code, it was backwards compatible and was nice > > to look at, but didn't had the powerfull functionality it has now.. There's > > not much wrong with the current API, the only thing is that no body ever > > took the time to go thru the code and optimise it. I for one will keep > > working on THIS version of the API and know it can be cleaned up, and make > > it work on any other future browsers coming our way. > > > > let the flaming begin. > > > > Pascal Bestebroer (pb...@oi...) > > Software ontwikkelaar > > Oberon Informatiesystemen b.v. > > http://www.oibv.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > > Dyn...@li... > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free by AVG Free Edition Download at: http://www.grisoft.com/html/us_index.cfm Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.231 / Virus Database: 112 - Release Date: 2/12/01 |