From: Raymond S. <dst...@or...> - 2001-02-21 16:06:24
|
My post was a quote from O'Rielly's. Also, I am gathering all the data I can find that might be pertinent to finding what works. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Emberson" <emb...@co...> To: <dyn...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 9:10 AM Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Continuing Freeing memory > Raymond Smith wrote: > > > Sounds like we need a "null cycle killer". Damn sure circular references a > > playing a big roll in our leak... > > > > A good, modern gc collects cycles. The Boehm gc does and so does java's. I > assume > M$ uses similar technology. Don't know what NS does. All > memory allocated is kept track of. Starting from a set of "well known objects" > (top > level objects) one sweeps marking all reachable objects (and not traversing > objects > more than once). Then all objects that have not been marked are collected. > Cycles are NOT a problem. > > Richard Emberson > > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev > |