From: Pascal <pb...@oi...> - 2001-02-21 11:03:22
|
Ok, it then seems I misunderstood the complete discussion.. but I don't think everyone was on the same thinking-plane as Robert is, and some other people (the few that actually reacted) might have thought the same way I have: the plan of creating a new API from the ground up. This is something I don't think has any potential what so ever (just restating my point here) for the reasons I posted in the other mail. I'm all for cleaning up the current code, but not for changing things around "hoping" it will end up faster and lighter (I strongly believe it won't) To reply to Raymond's disullisioned problem quote: "To be honest I was a little disillusioned with the overall response to what I was proposing. And I'm certainly not interested in expending a large amount of my time for nothing." That's just part of my problem as well.. people seem to like discussing things (I'm one of them) but almost nothing is being done! This is what I see as the biggest problem with the DynAPI2. I have now read numerous posts of people saying that they fixed bugs, created great add-ons.. great, BUT SHOW US. don't tell us you did it, and it works, and it's better..give it up! (read the LICENSE agreement). Everyone saying that the current API could be improved alot is correct, but not for the reasons they give, but for the fact that if everyone would start sharing there work more it would have grown faster. Ofcourse, Raymond, your ideas are great and planning things is fine (as long as we're planning the enhancement and continueation of THIS api).. but if planning is all that's being done by people, then I'd rather not participate...and I fear that that's the case (as usual) "<emotes> flips blow torch in the air and extends the hand towards the rest of you all." lets see who will reach towards it then, just don't get disillusioned again... Pascal Bestebroer (pb...@oi...) Software ontwikkelaar Oberon Informatiesystemen b.v. http://www.oibv.com > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: dyn...@li... > [mailto:dyn...@li...]Namens Jordi - > IlMaestro > - Ministral > Verzonden: woensdag 21 februari 2001 10:25 > Aan: dyn...@li... > Onderwerp: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Freeing Memory > > > Amen. However Pascal I don't think anyone pretends to redo > the API. We should > blame Raymond ( as usual :) ) because he introduced the 3 in > the name and made > it all look scary. > > When we're saying DynAPI3 I understand we're meaning DynAPI2 > with better and > cleaner code, not a new API. |