From: Bart B. <ba...@ho...> - 2001-02-17 12:11:25
|
Yes... and now we are again getting into the discussion of a split = browser API. What you are proposing is taking a step in that direction.. I would take it on step further... and split up the code in different = files alltogether (to minimize downloaded code and add clarity) ... but let's not dwell upon that... ;) I have been developing my SuperClass for some time now... and recently I = have been doing a LOT of optimizing... so I'm getting to be very profitient in this area. And there is room for = tons of optimization in DynAPI. But your suggestion is a very good start. >this is not how it should be done. Alot of methods in DynAPI contain if >statements for ie/ns checking.. you can optimize this by removing the = IF >statements from the runtime loop, simple example of setX/setY: > >if (is.ns) { > DynLayer.prototype._setX=3Dfunction(){ this.css.left=3Dthis.x; >this.pageX=3Dthis.getPageX() } > DynLayer.prototype._setY=3Dfunction(){ this.css.top=3Dthis.y; >this.pageY=3Dthis.getPageY() } >} else { > DynLayer.prototype._setX=3Dfunction(){ this.css.pixelLeft=3Dthis.x; >this.pageX=3Dthis.getPageX() } > DynLayer.prototype._setY=3Dfunction(){ this.css.pixelTop=3Dthis.y; >this.pageY=3Dthis.getPageY() } >} > > >Your still assigning methods to the prototype, but at parse time, not = run >time.. removing the IF statements, and speeding the execution of the = code >(not by much, but it is an increase in speed) > >This can be done for multiple methods (setHTML, moveTo, setSizez, etc) > > > > > >Pascal Bestebroer >pa...@dy... >http://www.dynamic-core.net > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: dyn...@li... >> [mailto:dyn...@li...]Namens Bart Bizon >> Verzonden: vrijdag 16 februari 2001 23:18 >> Aan: dyn...@li... >> Onderwerp: SV: [Dynapi-Dev] TCanvas vs. DynLayer >> >> >> true ... but by that definition you would expect windows programs >> to release memory by default... and the OS should handle it .. right? >> Which it doesn't.... it's not just DynAPI pages that swallow >> memory, ordinary pages do to... >> and so do many windows programs. >> (But... this is assuming that windows is actually a good OS... >> which it is... NOT) >> Taking this into account... you have to work with the conditions >> at hand... >> >> -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- >> Fr=E5n: Pascal Bestebroer <pa...@dy...> >> Till: dyn...@li... = <dyn...@li...> >> Datum: den 16 februari 2001 20:15 >> =C4mne: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] TCanvas vs. DynLayer >> >> >> >to be even less helpful here, I truly believe it can't be fixed, and = that >> >it's an browser issue.. >> >I truly hope I'm wrong, but it seems to me that the javascript >> interpreters >> >should automatically unload any memory no matter what. >> >This is how all (good) environments work) they get space to work in, = and >> >once it's done that single memory block is freed. >> > >> >Maybe I'm wrong (and I truly hope so) but I won't be searching for a >> >solution on this. >> > >> >Pascal Bestebroer >> >pa...@dy... >> >http://www.dynamic-core.net >> > >> >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> >> Van: dyn...@li... >> >> [mailto:dyn...@li...]Namens Michael = Ellis >> >> Verzonden: vrijdag 16 februari 2001 19:25 >> >> Aan: 'dyn...@li...' >> >> Onderwerp: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] TCanvas vs. DynLayer >> >> >> >> >> >> I agree... this is a huge problem. Pretty much makes the >> software unusable >> >> unless you have a ton of ram. >> >> >> >> I currently have a level-3 defect on the memory leak generated by >> >> DynAPI for >> >> a software product that is supposed to be out the door in a >> week. We have >> >> not successfully had any impact whatsoever on this issue to date. >> >> >> >> Anyone had any luck with this? Anyone have any ideas? >> >> >> >> Mike Ellis >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Lasse Lindg=E5rd [mailto:la...@li...] >> >> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 07:00 >> >> To: dyn...@li... >> >> Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] TCanvas vs. DynLayer >> >> >> >> >> >> More importantly than upfront performance: >> >> Does it reduce the memory leak ? >> >> >> >> If not then performance will be on a freight train to >> swap-land in no time >> >> anyways. >> >> >> >> My current DynAPI pages eat a meg or more pr. reload. It is not a = big >> >> problem at my 256mb machine. But just the thoughts of my clients = 32mb >> >> machines makes me shiver. >> >> >> >> Any news on the memoryleak front ? >> >> Is anybody working on it at all or are everybody busy doing >> "cool" stuff >> >> instead ? >> >> >> >> For DynAPI ever to be useful. We really need to get that memory = problem >> >> fixed. >> >> >> >> /Lasse >> >> >> >> >> >> -- __--__-- >> >> >> >> Message: 6 >> >> From: "Eytan Heidingsfeld" <ey...@tr...> >> >> To: "Dynapi-Dev" <dyn...@li...> >> >> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:18:56 +0200 >> >> Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] TCanvas vs. DynLayer >> >> Reply-To: dyn...@li... >> >> >> >> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. >> >> >> >> ------=3D_NextPart_000_0002_01C09823.65DE2AF0 >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; >> >> charset=3D"iso-8859-1" >> >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> >> >> >> I'd love to test performance one against the other. The only test >> >> I did was >> >> create 100 layers and check the times. In IE TCanvas was 200 >> ms faster and >> >> in NS it was 1300(canvas) to 10000(dynlayer). >> >> >> >> I'd love you guys to start tearing my canvas to shreds. >> >> >> >> Included in the zip are: >> >> tcanvas.js >> >> browser.js >> >> >> >> they need to be included in the document(working on adding = .include) >> >> >> >> 8an >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> >> Dyn...@li... >> >> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev >> >> >> > >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> >Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> >Dyn...@li... >> >http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> Dyn...@li... >> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev >> > > >_______________________________________________ >Dynapi-Dev mailing list >Dyn...@li... >http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev > |