From: Michael P. <mp...@ph...> - 2001-02-08 13:49:02
|
cool. haven't had much of a chance to play with the intervals yet. thanks for the info. Jordi \"ilMaestro\" Ministral wrote: > I've tested, and it is far more efficient to have one single interval. > Moverover, my tests showed that NS will fail miserably to render any of the > animated layers when there's, say, about 50 setIntervals moving different > layers, whereas having one interval move 100 layers performed smoothly. > > Richard Bennett wrote: > > > I haven't tested whether > > thread running 100 animations is more efficient than 100 animations using > > their own setTimeout, but I would expect so. > > > > Cheers, > > Richard Bennett > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev -- Michael Pemberton mp...@ph... ICQ: 12107010 |