From: Jordi \ilMaestro\ M. <jmi...@or...> - 2001-02-08 11:07:52
|
I've tested, and it is far more efficient to have one single interval. Moverover, my tests showed that NS will fail miserably to render any of the animated layers when there's, say, about 50 setIntervals moving different layers, whereas having one interval move 100 layers performed smoothly. Richard Bennett wrote: > I haven't tested whether > thread running 100 animations is more efficient than 100 animations using > their own setTimeout, but I would expect so. > > Cheers, > Richard Bennett |