From: Cameron H. <ca...@bi...> - 2001-01-30 21:37:32
|
I think Richard tested them. Fair enough though if you're not sure about them. Perhaps if there are to be people moderating additions to the CVS you should assign a browser to each moderator (or are you the only moderator Robert?). If someone (or more than one person) is experience with NS6 or Mac IE5 then they should check and okay any changes. The only testing I've done is with the DynAPI examples, and with the site I'm working on. It's better to test with something complicated I think, as it tends to show up faults in the code, the examples are a bit too simple for this. Widgets are good for highlighting problems I've found. Some of the developers must know a bit about NS6 though as there is a lot of support in the API already, although some of it is a bit out of date (for example, NS6 final supports innerHTML). Robert Rainwater wrote: > >> I'm a bit curious on that front. I've submitted some patches for NS6, anyone >> on the developers must know about them, I've dropped hints about them being >> put into CVS numerous times. They never have been put into CVS, and I've >> never received any explanation why not. Fair enough if my fixes aren't good >> enough, if that's why they aren't going in tell me, perhaps I can improve >> them. But it is frustrating not knowing, and it's not a great incentive to >> carry on trying to contribute. > > > I have no problem including many of the NS 6 patches. However, I'm > not very experienced in NS 6, so I hesitate to make any changes. > Especially since its hard to tell of others have tested the patches > themselves. > > Maybe we just need a better process for patch submission. But unless > others in the group are actively testing the patches, then I don't > want to make changes, especially NS 6 or Mac patches. |