From: Cameron H. <ca...@bi...> - 2001-01-30 18:54:42
|
> * Group moderation, this is what Dann Pascal and Robert do (among others) > and is basically taking the decisions. > Someone has to do that, otherwise everybody would be overwriting > each others > code in CVS 'cause they didn't like the "style". > There are a few things that could be improved here to, as I feel a lot of > knowledge gets lost as it's simply ignored, but it should come from two > sides, submitters should be able to accept at face value that > their "great" > fix, wasn't accepted, but the moderator should at least acknowledge having > seen the submission, if not giving a reason for every line of code they > reject/accept. I'm a bit curious on that front. I've submitted some patches for NS6, anyone on the developers must know about them, I've dropped hints about them being put into CVS numerous times. They never have been put into CVS, and I've never received any explanation why not. Fair enough if my fixes aren't good enough, if that's why they aren't going in tell me, perhaps I can improve them. But it is frustrating not knowing, and it's not a great incentive to carry on trying to contribute. I'm sure this goes for anyone who's trying to help out, if your help is completely ignored then you stop helping. mind you if your efforts are completely shot down, perhaps you stop helping too. so be nice when you tell people they their code is shite ;-) cameron. |