From: Doug M. <do...@cr...> - 2001-01-30 18:22:54
|
Not a bad idea. I will look into such an association for www.AllTheWhile.com (my other company) I'll let y'all know how that goes.. Doug ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Ellis" <Mic...@il...> To: <dyn...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 9:20 AM Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] Next Generation > Just to further clarify... Doug and Raymond's statement are correct. The > www.statmarket.com is much broader based... they collect the stats from > anyone using 'HitBox'. There daily sample is supposed to be based on around > 50,000,000 hits. Unfortunately the free report uses old sample data, and the > subscriptions/custom demographic reports aren't cheap (about $950/report, I > don't even know what they charge for a full subscription). > > This is a list of the browsers/platforms that most of our domestic customers > need supported (this may differ for your clients needs. Please feel free to > flame me on this, I don't pretend to have the answers... just a starting > point): > > Windows: > > IE 4.1 (SP1) > IE 5.0 > IE 5.5 > > NS 4.08 > NS 4.76 > NS 6.0 > > Mac: > > IE 5.0 (Ugly, I know) > NS 4.08 > NS 6.0 > > Maybe it would make sense for someone in charge of the site to see about a > ASP/strategic alliance (link) with an organization that provides good > statistics. It would certianly help educate us, and lend an air of > credability to our cross platform/cross browser code premise. Then again, > setting up these relationships is usually a pain in the ass. > > Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Doug Melvin [mailto:do...@cr...] > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 11:23 > To: dyn...@li... > Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Next Generation > > > that's not 'in the world' > All stats on that site are from visiter to that site, and > represent ONLY visiters to that site. > Not the world. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cameron Hart" <ca...@bi...> > To: <dyn...@li...> > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 1:59 AM > Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] Next Generation > > > > It is quite frightening to know that 5 people in the world are using MSIE > > 1.x ;-) > > > > I mean, has anyone even seen IE 1??? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: dyn...@li... > > > [mailto:dyn...@li...]On Behalf Of Raymond > > > Smith > > > Sent: 30 January 2001 05:50 > > > To: dyn...@li... > > > Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Next Generation > > > > > > > > > Carefull if your using the "sample stats" from there. They date back to > > > 1999 and reflect an older reality. Most recent browser stats I have > found > > > are at www.thecounter.com. From October 2000. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Michael Ellis" <Mic...@il...> > > > To: <dyn...@li...> > > > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 2:53 PM > > > Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] Next Generation > > > > > > > > > > Amen brother! > > > > > > > > No argument here... Although we can be educated to, we cannot expect > nor > > > > demand which platform/browser our end-users choose. If our > > > software is to > > > be > > > > taken seriously, and serve a broad community we must be reasonable > about > > > > which platforms/browsers we support. If you think I'm full of it, > check > > > the > > > > browser/platform statistics at www.statmarket.com (don't rely on > > > statistics > > > > gathered by developer forums, they attract developers like us and are > > > > typically not representative of our products end-users). > > > > > > > > Mike Ellis > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: .:: OCB ::. [mailto:oc...@ho...] > > > > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 10:15 > > > > To: dyn...@li... > > > > Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Next Generation > > > > > > > > > > > > Next generation ??? > > > > > > > > Would it not be a good idea to get the DynApi2 working in all browsers > > > > (basic methods, moveTo, event handlers etc; not wigits, IMO they take > a > > > > backseat to basic functionality) before even discussing another > > > generation > > > > of the API. > > > > > > > > I haven't contributed anything in months (which is beyond my control) > so > > > > feel quite apprehensive about posting this but again, IMO, it > > > makes common > > > > sense to get the basic's of this project crossbrowser (NN6 included) > and > > > bug > > > > > > > > free before launching into another generation of the API. > > > > > > > > Flame away !!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Jared Nuzzolillo" <ja...@aa...> > > > > >Reply-To: dyn...@li... > > > > >To: <dyn...@li...> > > > > >Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] Next Generation > > > > >Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:46:41 -0500 > > > > > > > > > >I have a feeling that certain people are wanting to implement > > > class-like > > > > >inheritance because it is more familiar/comfortable to them. > > > > > > > > > >I strongly agree with Pascal. Prototype-based inheritance works > > > > >beautifully, > > > > >and is native to javascript, so why would we want to enforce a > > > different > > > > >type of inheritance to use the API? Most dynapi users will at least > be > > > > >familiar with javascript, and may be expecting Prototype-like > behavior. > > > > > > > > > >It's kind of like creating a number class instead of using built in > > > number > > > > >objects and primitive types. It's pointeless. > > > > > > > > > >As far as the class/prototype argument as to what Netscape says, the > > > first > > > > >line of this article: > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/communicator/jsobj/con > > tents.htm > > > > > > > >reads as follows: > > > > > > > >"JavaScript is an object-oriented language based on prototypes, rather > > > >than, > > > >as is common, being class-based." > > > > > > > >-jaredn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >Dynapi-Dev mailing list > > > >Dyn...@li... > > > >http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________________ > > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at > http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > > > Dyn...@li... > > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > > Dyn...@li... > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > > Dyn...@li... > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev |