From: Pascal B. <pa...@dy...> - 2001-01-11 17:41:48
|
the DynObject is one of those things I just added to my own distribution (only since the last release). I also believe it should be in the official distro, but it requires some work and then testing to see if everything is modified correctly (as I have done with my own code.. which took quite some time :) Ofcourse it's easier now that I know where the important problems can occur, but I think we should focus on getting the current release out.. and then implement that idea (if the other dev's agree). cya, Pascal Bestebroer pa...@dy... http://www.dynamic-core.net > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: dyn...@li... > [mailto:dyn...@li...]Namens Jared Nuzzolillo > Verzonden: donderdag 11 januari 2001 17:10 > Aan: dyn...@li... > Onderwerp: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] new f.a.q. > > > maybe I missed this in the last 400 mails, and I'm sure its been properly > discussed, but can someone fill me in on why we are not using the > Dynobject > scheme Pascal came up with. What is the benefit of not doing it that way? > I've really been trying hard to go through the code and get a > better idea on > how it all works, and it just seems that pascal's technique makes more > sense... > > -jaredn > > btw, this crashes netscape 6 for some reason...i wonder why: > > gd=document.getElementById > t=gd("a_valid_divs_id") > > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev > |