Re[2]: [Dynapi-Dev] Making progress on a Java gui tool

[Robert R. <rra...@ya...>]

As far as I know none of those widgets are in CVS.  Aren't those
Pascal's widgets?

-- 
// Robert Rainwater

On 1/10/2001, 6:02:56 PM EST, Doug wrote about "[Dynapi-Dev] Making progress on a Java gui tool":

> How do I get access to the CVS system..
> I've fixed a few bugs myself..
> Such as the 'movebility' of the skinwindow.
> I also updated the doDock mothod of the skintoolbar.
> Now calling doDock(0) will dock the toolbar at the top.
> (re-position it and set it's width)
> and passing a 1 instead will dock it at the bottom.
> I am also working on an elatic object..
> What this does is resizes and repositions the content on your page for any
> browser size.. and automatically does so when you change the size of the
> browser..


> Assuming I do get access to CVS..
> Is the bug list at sourceforge complete?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Raymond Smith" <dst...@or...>
> To: <dyn...@li...>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 1:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Making progress on a Java gui tool


>> I was beginning to wonder where Dan went off to, now we know.  It does
>> appear that we've created a bit of a two headed hydra here, as others
>> mentioned might happen.  Dan's off working on a DynBuilder while other
>> pontificate about the holy-grail of RAD tools to speed up "the still
> bugged
>> version of DynAPI2" that hasn't had a refresh since November of 2000.
>>
>> While I do my best to muddle thru this code and help Robert debug this
> stuff
>> I fear I submit about as much confusion as contribution.  But I get the
>> feeling that others are not really 'actively debugging' the current CVS.
>> Dan's working on a GUI which he will 'share' with us, thus allowing us to
>> further defocus our efforts while other do grand debate on what this
> "thing"
>> should be.
>>
>> It would be nice to, at a minimum, clean up the current base code in the
> CVS
>> before we defocus the limited masses even more.
>>
>> Sorry for the rant.  But ALOT of change was introduced with precreate and
>> inline creation integration that still needs to be cleaned up.  It seems
> the
>> only really active debugger right now is Robert and Pascal (on a limited
>> basis).
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
>> Dyn...@li...
>> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev


> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> Dyn...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev