RE: [Dynapi-Dev] DynAPI.include() and Libraries

[Michael P. <mp...@ph...>]

I've found that it is easier to read (and also looks more java-like) if
your code pages don't need to have .js everywhere.

Isn't it better to expect people to leave the .js off rather than treat
it like and error and compensate for it?

It also reduces the need to have it at the end of every library entry.
As for speed, if it reduces the string sizes and treats the shorter
annotation as the correct one, doesn't this make it faster.  It means
that those of us who leave off the .js don't have to get the DynAPI to
append the .js before it generates the <script> entry.  Again, the one
line of code is faster than the two.
--
Michael Pemberton
mp...@ph...
ICQ: 12107010