RE: [Dynapi-Dev] inheritance crusade / SuperClass stuff

[Alexey M. <ma...@ca...>]

> Doing this means an extra work in trying to maintain standardized all the

	Yes. One of the solution is to make test-examples.
 So you must run this tests every time (automatically , like Pascals
 test wizard).
	But it is really a problem.

> something to an API we must add the same functionality to all other; and not

	But. We could separate wich part is independent (DynLayer API) 
 and which is dependent (the dynlayer.js). So widgets have no dependent
 parts at all.

> Im sure we don't want a DynAPI that says: "this is disponible only for NS"
> or vice versa, then we most work a lot to keep things in the right path.

	Of course :)))

					Malx
-- 
There is no thing in the world, which is more powerfull, than default