Re: Re: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] inheritance crusade / SuperClass stuff

[Alexey M. <ma...@ca...>]

On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Barre Bizon wrote:

> didn't read my previous posts...

	sorry , I'm new here. Just look in some archive posts...

> Object orientation exists for a purpose, and no, Javascript 
> isn't  "true" OOP, but close enough to be able to use the 

	I am telling you that JavaScript is no _OOP_
 it is _OP_.
	It is not "oriented". It is true Object language.
 Ok - It is IMHO of course :)))
	But repaeting - JS is much more powerfull then Java/C++ OOP.
 So - I am very upset you trying to limit it to OOP you know how
 to work with instead of learning JS!!!  :-/

> I thought creating a constructor method was a clean and 
> easy way of doing "extended" functions initialization.

	As for OOP - the only way.
  As for JavaScript - the worst way. Yes it is included in JS1.3
 for thouse who likes "Java" , but....

> But sure, assigning DynLayer as a method and then calling 
> it works too... :)

	So the question is - which way is better and why :)))

				Malx