Re: Re: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] inheritance crusade / SuperClass stuff

[Barre B. <ba...@ho...>]

Another thing... neither the function.call() nor the 
function.apply() method work under IE4+.
Unfortunately.

/ Bart


> On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Barre Bizon wrote:
> 
> 
> 	I thinks you have learned too much of OOP languages 
like 
> Java C++ etc.
> 	JavaScript is not OOP - it is Object Language - not 
> just merely OO :)
> 
> 	I would recomend to look deeper into JavaScript.
>  If i'm not mistaken - DunAPI never uses such thing 
as "with"
> 
> 	Also ... If only Netscape4 would be standart.... 
and JavaScrip1.3
> with it:
> ----------------------
> You can use call to chain constructors for an object,
> similar to Java. In the following example, the constructor
> for the product object is defined with two parameters,
> name and value. Another object, prod_dept, initializes its
> unique variable (dept) and calls the constructor for
> product in its constructor to initialize the other 
variables.
> 
> function product(name, value){
>    this.name = name;
>    if(value > 1000)
>       this.value = 999;
>    else
>       this.value = value;
> }
> 
> function prod_dept(name, value, dept){
>    this.dept = dept;
>    product.call(this, name, value);
> }
> 
> prod_dept.prototype = new product();
> 
> // since 5 is less than 100 value is set
> cheese = new prod_dept("feta", 5, "food");
> 
> // since 5000 is above 1000, value will be 999
> car = new prod_dept("honda", 5000, "auto");
> 
> ---------  from JS1.3 documentation.
> 
> 
> 	Also I like "watch" method alot. but it is Netscape 
only :-/
>  It allows you to get rid of methods..
> 	Just  mylayer.x=12 would move the layer.
> 
> 
> 	And... why you need to create object , based
>  on something but not to extend the one you have?!
> 
> ps. In the past you have had ability to make errors...
> 	Now ! with C++ - you could inherit them! :)
> 
> 				Malx
> 
> > Hmm.. but how about wanting widgets to fully extend 
> > Dynlayer.. i.e. supporting exactly the same 
initialization 
> > as Dynlayer has without writing the code over again.
> > 
> > Do you not think that a construct() method would be a 
good 
> > idea? As per my previous posts... 
> > It wouldn't alter anything in essence.. nor complicate 
> > anything. Just how the Dynlayer is initialized, 
allowing 
> > widgets to (easily) do a general DynLayer 
initialization.
> > Apart from widget specific initialization...
> > 
> > / Bart
> > 
> > > I absolutely agree. Things are already complicated 
> > enought and I don't want to add one single line of code 
> > there.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Dan Steinman wrote:
> > > 
> > > > It is both mine and Pascal's opinion that no 
special 
> > inheritance system is needed for DynAPI.  Just make 
careful 
> > attention, and structure using basic prototypes and you 
can 
> > do everything (except doing multiple inheritance).  
Don't 
> > overwrite variables, and you don't even necessarily 
need to 
> > overwrite methods, and everything works perfectly.  The 
> > most simplistic solution is often the best, and I 
believe 
> > that is the case here.
> > > >
> > > > Dan
> > > >
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > > Dyn...@li...
> > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-
dev
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > Dyn...@li...
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev
> > 
> 
> 
>                  
^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^   
>           /        Word is not a color, but a 
picture.           \
>      _ _ /    To understand it you must draw it by 
yourself. ___  \ _ _
>          \   -------  __  -- |^     malvin@cad.ntu-
kpi.kiev.ua    / 
>           \       ---  ---   | http://cad.ntu-
kpi.kiev.ua/~malvin/   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> Dyn...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev