Re: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] inheritance crusade / SuperClass stuff

[Barre B. <ba...@ho...>]

Hmm.. but how about wanting widgets to fully extend 
Dynlayer.. i.e. supporting exactly the same initialization 
as Dynlayer has without writing the code over again.

Do you not think that a construct() method would be a good 
idea? As per my previous posts... 
It wouldn't alter anything in essence.. nor complicate 
anything. Just how the Dynlayer is initialized, allowing 
widgets to (easily) do a general DynLayer initialization.
Apart from widget specific initialization...

/ Bart

> I absolutely agree. Things are already complicated 
enought and I don't want to add one single line of code 
there.
> 
> 
> Dan Steinman wrote:
> 
> > It is both mine and Pascal's opinion that no special 
inheritance system is needed for DynAPI.  Just make careful 
attention, and structure using basic prototypes and you can 
do everything (except doing multiple inheritance).  Don't 
overwrite variables, and you don't even necessarily need to 
overwrite methods, and everything works perfectly.  The 
most simplistic solution is often the best, and I believe 
that is the case here.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> Dyn...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev