|
From: Barre B. <ba...@ho...> - 2000-11-24 10:36:31
|
hmm seems kindof obscure..
It strikes me as having a construct method to be a cleaner
way of doing initialization.. almost like calling super()
in Java... hm?
(The code below should work)
function DynLayer() { this.construct(arguments) }
DynLayer.prototype.construct=function(){
var a=arguments[0]
........etc.......
function widget(){
this.construct(arguments)
}
widget.prototype=new DynLayer
> Forget what I wrote.... it should be this instead:
>
> function widget(argarray) {
> this.DynLayer = DynLayer
> eval("this.DynLayer("+argarray.join(",")+")")
> }
> widget.prototype = new DynLayer
>
> /Lunna
>
> At 2000-11-24 06:20 , you wrote:
> >For that particular case, use the array's join() method.
> >
> >function widget(argarray) {
> > this.DynLayer = DynLayer
> > this.DynLayer(argarray.join(","))
> >}
> >widget.prototype = new DynLayer
> >
> >/Lunna
> >
> >At 2000-11-24 02:07 , you wrote:
> >>Hmm... does not seem to work at all.
> >>IE4 says it doesn't support the property or method.
> >>Could you elaborate, or send me an example of this
being used somewhere?
> >>Another problem: DynLayer treats objects sent as the
first argument as a
> >>DynLayer object to setStyle after.
> >>And as arrays(the array arguments in this case) are
objects and
> >>correspondingly are identified as such, the setStyle
method will be called,
> >>which is not the intent.
> >>
> >>/Bart
> >>
> >>-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> >>Från: Dan Steinman <dy...@fu...>
> >>Till: dyn...@li... <dynapi-
de...@li...>
> >>Datum: den 24 november 2000 01:37
> >>Ämne: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Widget constructor
> >>
> >>
> >>>Just make your widget constructor call the DynLayer as
a method:
> >>>
> >>>function widget(arguments) {
> >>> this.DynLayer = DynLayer
> >>> this.Dynlayer(arguments)
> >>>}
> >>>widget.prototype = new DynLayer
> >>>
> >>>Dan
> >>>
> >>>On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 12:39:05AM +0100, Bartek wrote:
> >>>> I was wondering whether it is a good idea to have
some inheritible
> >>constructor functionality for DynLayer.
> >>>> I want to be able to create a widget object that
extends the DynLayer and
> >>inherits its initialization, i.e so I wouldn't have to
rewrite the
> >>initialization code for the widget but instead do
something like this:
> >>>>
> >>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>> function WidgetLayer(){
> >>>> this.construct(arguments)
> >>>> }
> >>>> WidgetLayer.prototype=new DynLayer
> >>>>
> >>>> -----------------------------------------------------
-
> >>>>
> >>>> and it would look something like this for dynlayer:
> >>>>
> >>>> -----------------------------------------------------
----------------
> >>>>
> >>>> function DynLayer(){ this.construct(arguments) }
> >>>> DynLayer.prototype.construct=function(){
> >>>> alert()
> >>>> var a=arguments
> >>>> if (a.length==1 && a[0]!=null && typeof(a[0])
=="object")
> >>this.setStyle(a[0])
> >>>> else {
> >>>> this.id=a[0]||"JSDynLayer"+
(DynLayer.nullCount++)
> >>>> this.x=a[1]||0
> >>>> .......etc...
> >>>> }
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
> >>>>
> >>>> I am trying to implent this as I write, to test it
out, and I'm having
> >>some problems.
> >>>> Maybe there is a better way of doing this... If so ,
please let me
> know. :)
> >>>> Or am I on the right track?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> /Bart
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> >>>Dyn...@li...
> >>>http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-
dev
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> >>Dyn...@li...
> >>http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> >Dyn...@li...
> >http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> Dyn...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev
|