From: Robert R. <rra...@ya...> - 2000-10-30 22:36:42
|
> Am I the only one who hates having to name my scripts after the path to > them? :-) > > core.gui.window.js > core.ibs.scroll.js > core.sa.this.js > core.api.that.js I've never figured out why the dynapi files were named that way. In java core.gui.window.js would mean core/gui/window.js. That seems more logical to me as well. And since we are using a directory scheme, there shouldn't be a problem with files having the same name. > Also: there was a proposed patch a SourceForge that would have prevented > scripts from being loaded twice, but never implemented. Was there > something wrong with this approach? The fix can easily be dropped in the include method. But, I'm still not sure why its needed. Its only a couple of lines so I guess it wouldn't hurt... Robert |