RE: [Dynapi-Dev] Old Browser Support

[C K. <cki...@ne...>]

Well I got the examples from Create Layer to Hover Animation in that
snapshot to work in old browsers now (except TabManager because my =
laptop
doesn't have a separate numeric keypad with arrows), but one major =
stumbling
block which maybe someone can answer. In NN4.03 almost all examples =
shoot a
"JavaScript Error: too much recursion" onmousedown and onmouseup in =
document
areas of the page. Two of the same error for every click. Any ideas?

Christopher Kissinger=20
Web Development Consultant


>>>  -----Original Message-----
>>>  From: dyn...@li...=20
>>>  [mailto:dyn...@li...] On Behalf=20
>>>  Of Raymond Irving
>>>  Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:09 PM
>>>  To: dyn...@li...
>>>  Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Old Browser Support
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>>  I say we also try and include NN 4.03 but it's just
>>>  that NN4.03 has a major problem with functions not
>>>  return a value.
>>> =20
>>>  "With the DOM, anything is possible, so the need for a
>>>  JS wrapper API becomes less imperative."
>>> =20
>>>  I don't think so! I thought that DOM-Browsers would
>>>  make DynAPI go away but I was wrong. Over the past few
>>>  months I've had nightmares trying to get apps to
>>>  display and work the same in all three of the major
>>>  browsers.
>>> =20
>>>  --
>>>  Raymond Irving
>>>  =20
>>>  --- C Kissinger <cki...@ne...> wrote:
>>>  > I first started using DynAPI because I needed a
>>>  > cross-browser solution for
>>>  > consistency across DOM/non-DOM browsers in ecommerce
>>>  > web apps. This seemed
>>>  > to have been the original focus with CBScript and
>>>  > DynAPI2, but lately the
>>>  > focus seems to have changed to more of an advanced
>>>  > app factory (still a good
>>>  > thing).
>>>  > =20
>>>  > I am still busy trying to port DynAPI3 Oct. 4, 2003
>>>  > snapshot for backwards
>>>  > compatibility with NN4.03 and IE4, which when it is
>>>  > finished will probably
>>>  > serve me well into the distant future as a browser
>>>  > paleontologist.
>>>  > =20
>>>  > I would like to see a poll of current users and
>>>  > developers for determining
>>>  > the primary focus: advanced functionality vs. wider
>>>  > cross-browser support.
>>>  > With the DOM, anything is possible, so the need for
>>>  > a JS wrapper API becomes
>>>  > less imperative. DynAPI has been great for both so
>>>  > far, but I see people
>>>  > wanting to move forward and drop support. I can't do
>>>  > that, but I'm sure
>>>  > DynAPI will still be great either way.
>>>  > =20
>>>  > Thanks!
>>>  > =20
>>>  >=20
>>>  > Christopher Kissinger=20
>>>  > Web Development Consultant
>>>  >=20
>>>  >=20
>>>  > =20
>>>  >=20
>>>  >=20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>>  __________________________________
>>>  Do you Yahoo!?
>>>  The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
>>>  http://shopping.yahoo.com
>>> =20
>>> =20