Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Old Browser Support

[Raymond I. <xw...@ya...>]

I say we also try and include NN 4.03 but it's just
that NN4.03 has a major problem with functions not
return a value.

"With the DOM, anything is possible, so the need for a
JS wrapper API becomes less imperative."

I don't think so! I thought that DOM-Browsers would
make DynAPI go away but I was wrong. Over the past few
months I've had nightmares trying to get apps to
display and work the same in all three of the major
browsers.

--
Raymond Irving
 
--- C Kissinger <cki...@ne...> wrote:
> I first started using DynAPI because I needed a
> cross-browser solution for
> consistency across DOM/non-DOM browsers in ecommerce
> web apps. This seemed
> to have been the original focus with CBScript and
> DynAPI2, but lately the
> focus seems to have changed to more of an advanced
> app factory (still a good
> thing).
>  
> I am still busy trying to port DynAPI3 Oct. 4, 2003
> snapshot for backwards
> compatibility with NN4.03 and IE4, which when it is
> finished will probably
> serve me well into the distant future as a browser
> paleontologist.
>  
> I would like to see a poll of current users and
> developers for determining
> the primary focus: advanced functionality vs. wider
> cross-browser support.
> With the DOM, anything is possible, so the need for
> a JS wrapper API becomes
> less imperative. DynAPI has been great for both so
> far, but I see people
> wanting to move forward and drop support. I can't do
> that, but I'm sure
> DynAPI will still be great either way.
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> 
> Christopher Kissinger 
> Web Development Consultant
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com