From: C K. <cki...@ne...> - 2003-10-22 20:43:34
|
I first started using DynAPI because I needed a cross-browser solution = for consistency across DOM/non-DOM browsers in ecommerce web apps. This = seemed to have been the original focus with CBScript and DynAPI2, but lately = the focus seems to have changed to more of an advanced app factory (still a = good thing). =20 I am still busy trying to port DynAPI3 Oct. 4, 2003 snapshot for = backwards compatibility with NN4.03 and IE4, which when it is finished will = probably serve me well into the distant future as a browser paleontologist. =20 I would like to see a poll of current users and developers for = determining the primary focus: advanced functionality vs. wider cross-browser = support. With the DOM, anything is possible, so the need for a JS wrapper API = becomes less imperative. DynAPI has been great for both so far, but I see people wanting to move forward and drop support. I can't do that, but I'm sure DynAPI will still be great either way. =20 Thanks! =20 Christopher Kissinger=20 Web Development Consultant =20 |