Re: [Dynapi-Dev] JavaScript Scripting Resources

SourceForge Headquarters 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

Hello,

>One question still remains.. Who's going to pay for
>the domain name every year? Can we find a sponser?

Yes you can. I'm prepared to pay for the domain. It's not a such a big money 
afterall.

- Juho Risku / Helmi Staff
  http://www.visualway.com/helmi

>From: Raymond Irving <xw...@ya...>
>Reply-To: dyn...@li...
>To: dyn...@li...
>Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] JavaScript Scripting Resources
>Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>One question still remains.. Who's going to pay for
>the domain name every year? Can we find a sponser?
>
>--
>Raymond Irving
>
>--- Leif W <war...@us...> wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "C Kissinger" <cki...@ne...>
> > > To: <dyn...@li...>
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 7:57 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] JavaScript Scripting
> > Resources
> > >
> > > OK, I get the point.
> > > The idea is to just redo the SF site.
> > >
> > > I thought it would help PR if we had dynapi.com
> > > or somesuch domain as the "public access" or
> > > slick "final release" site and concentrate on
> > > the SF site as dev site.
> >
> > Maybe it would be simpler to stay focussed on the
> > site redesign (which isn't
> > done yet) before switching ISPs.  This way we don't
> > have to juggle two major
> > changes at once.  But I wouldn't dismiss or devalue
> > the discussion about
> > other hosting options if that would be agreeable and
> > beneficial to the
> > group.  Always nice to have options.
> >
> > One point that really sticks out though, we really
> > should have the DNS
> > cleaned up so that they all point to the new
> > (primary?) site, wether it's on
> > SF or elsewhere.  Dan Steinman is the inventor and
> > reinventor of the DynAPI,
> > has been the cornerstone since its inception.  But
> > where has he been lately?
> > He doesn't post, so I don't know if he reads or
> > cares about the project or
> > is just to darn busy with all the other things that
> > come up in life.
> >
> > Anyways, the point I'm trying to make, is this
> > project also has a lot of new
> > talent who have put a lot of work into this DynAPI
> > 3.x, so it's maybe not
> > just Dan's private little project anymore.  Again, I
> > hate to sound like I'm
> > trying to take something away (i.e. pry the DNS out
> > of his hands), but maybe
> > more than one person (some voted DNS group) could
> > have access to the DNS
> > stuff so it could be more easily changed in the
> > future (i.e. not having to
> > wait if he's on vacation, if other mail is taking
> > priority, etc.).  And not
> > just one person controlling it who could shoot down
> > any plans to change
> > simply by saying "no, it's mine and I don't want to
> > do it, or I'm too busy
> > to bother right now".  That's my only concern.
> >
> > Leif
> >
> > > Christopher Kissinger
> > > Web Development Consultant
> > >
> > > Net Industries, Inc.
> > > www.netindustries.net
> > >
> > >
> > > >>>  -----Original Message-----
> > > >>>  From: dyn...@li...
> > > >>>
> > [mailto:dyn...@li...] On
> > Behalf
> > > >>>  Of Raymond Irving
> > > >>>  Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 9:51 AM
> > > >>>  To: dyn...@li...
> > > >>>  Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] JavaScript
> > Scripting Resources
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  Hi Chris,
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  Please see below:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  --- C Kissinger
> > <cki...@ne...> wrote:
> > > >>>  > OK, so if Dan has any input soon or if we
> > could
> > > >>>  > contact him, we ask him if he's willing to
> > point
> > > >>>  > his DNS at our IPs? Prefer .com, .org, or
> > .net?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  Ok. Are we planning on moving the DynAPI
> > website from
> > > >>>  SF to another ISP?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  > Like I said, I would be willing to put up
> > the web
> > > >>>  > space, unless someone else has a better
> > deal
> > > >>>  > (static IP with in-house server and OC3
> > maybe?).
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  Hmmm.. This is something that the webteam
> > will have to
> > > >>>  agree on. Keeping the website on SF would
> > make it
> > > >>>  accessible to all would be sf developers. The
> > other
> > > >>>  things that comes to mind when moving to
> > another ISP
> > > >>>  is the ability of the propiety ISP to provide
> > backups,
> > > >>>  24x7 support, etc
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  > As for PR, you're right Leif. We should
> > compile a
> > > >>>  > comprehensive list for release all at once,
> > slightly
> > > >>>  > before launch.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  I also like this PR idea. I think it's well
> > needed.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  --
> > > >>>  Raymond Irving
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  > Christopher D. Kissinger
> > > >>>  >
> > > >>>  > >>>  -----Original Message-----
> > > >>>  > >>>  From:
> > dyn...@li...
> > > >>>  > [mailto:dynapi-dev-
> > > >>>  > >>>  ad...@li...] On Behalf
> > Of Leif
> > > >>>  > W
> > > >>>  > >>>  Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003
> > 10:53 AM
> > > >>>  > >>>  To: dyn...@li...
> > > >>>  > >>>  Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] JavaScript
> > Scripting
> > > >>>  > Resources
> > > >>>  > >>>
> > > >>>  > >>>  Doing a comprehensive check (DNS, web,
> > mail),
> > > >>>  > >>>
> > > >>>  > >>>  Also checked dynapi.net and
> > dynapi.org, and Dan
> > > >>>  > Steinman has both of
> > > >>>  > >>>  those
> > > >>>  > >>>  also.  All three domains are using
> > DynDNS for
> > > >>>  > their DNS, so they would
> > > >>>  > >>>  need
> > > >>>  > >>>  to be updated (i.e. to a static dns
> > within
> > > >>>  > DynDNS) or changed to a
> > > >>>  > >>>  different
> > > >>>  > >>>  DNS provider.  dynapi.org and
> > dynapi.net both
> > > >>>  > point to the same RCN
> > > >>>  > >>>  cable
> > > >>>  > >>>  account while dynapi.com doesn't have
> > an IP.
> > > >>>  > dynapi.com, .net, and
> > > >>>  > >>>  .org all
> > > >>>  > >>>  don't hit a standard web server (i.e.
> > port 80.)
> > > >>>  >  This would need
> > > >>>  > >>>  changing to
> > > >>>  > >>>  hit the webservers.  www.dynapi.org
> > redirects
> > > >>>  > to
> > > >>>  > >>>  http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/dynapi/,
> > > >>>  > www.dynapi.net redirects to
> > > >>>  > >>>  dynapi.net:82.  These would need to
> > point to
> > > >>>  > the new IP.  dynapi.net
> > > >>>  > >>>  has an
> > > >>>  > >>>  MX record pointing to dynapi.net with
> > a mail
> > > >>>  > server listening, while
> > > >>>  > >>>  dynapi.com and dynapi.org have no MX
> > records.
> > > >>>  > If we're going to set up
> > > >>>  > >>>  mail
> > > >>>  > >>>  capabilities (accounts or simply
> > forwards) on a
> > > >>>  > new server, MX records
> > > >>>  > >>>  would
> > > >>>  > >>>  also have to be added/updated.
> > > >>>  > >>>
> > > >>>  > >>>  As far as the advertisement aspect
> > goes, I'd
> > > >>>  > volunteer as the primary
> > > >>>  > >>>  contact, and if anyone has suggestions
> > or
> > > >>>  > instructions about where to
> > > >>>  > >>>  go,
> > > >>>  > >>>  who to contact, how to make
> > submissions
>=== message truncated ===
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
>http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>Welcome to geek heaven.
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>_______________________________________________
>Dynapi-Dev mailing list
>Dyn...@li...
>http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../

_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail