From: Daniel L. <li...@hy...> - 2003-07-17 01:40:21
|
Too bad, cuz now you will get a lot more emails posted to the list that should have gone to just the author, like this one. With a Reply-to, there is no easy way to just send to the author (you have to copy-paste the address), whereas without a Reply-to, there is usually a convenient Reply-to-all button. So I say never include Reply-to unless you want to discourage private communication. dan Leif W wrote: >Looks like they added a Reply-To: header to the emails. > >[...] >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: dyn...@li... >List-Help: <mailto:dyn...@li...?subject=help> >[...] > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Raymond Irving" <xw...@ya...> > > >>Hi! >> >>I can't believe it! SF has finally fixed the "Reply" >>button. No more "Reply-To-All" I guess? Or is it me? >> >>-- >>Raymond Irving >> >> >> |