|
From: Jesse V. <je...@6t...> - 2003-06-08 17:53:19
|
Stephen,
Like others have posted already, I think both of our ideas can be
good additions for DynAPI.
I'm not sure about how HTTP keep alive works, but when I have my
page load in multiple scripts in Mozilla, you can see the status bar
showing Mozilla connecting / retrieving each file. So having the page
only load one large file sped up the page loading a good deal.
Jesse
Stephen Carroll wrote:
>LOL, well it seems like alot of us are on the same thread of thought. I like
>the idea of not having to hit the server multiple times, but doesn't 'HTTP
>keep alive' maintain one socket connection for the duration of gifs, src,
>etc. that are requested from a given HTTP server? This removes the overhead
>of open/close sockets at the TCP/IP level to a minimum for any given client.
>I do believe there is a speed increase in that HTTP parsing doesn't have to
>take place if it can be included in one main file. For library.load, I
>introduced a delay to allow multiple files to be requested from the HTTP
>server in my dynapi.asp idea. I also like the idea of never even having to
>mess with compression altogether, thats inherent of the dynapi.asp behavior.
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
>thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
>you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
>_______________________________________________
>Dynapi-Dev mailing list
>Dyn...@li...
>http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
>
>
|