|
From: Leif W <war...@us...> - 2003-06-04 20:41:38
|
I haven't familiarized myself with the TM usage yet, but maybe I can be an
impartial observer. The [@fieldname] is very easy to find when looking in
code. I gather you think the new way you suggest could be more powerful
(multi-line?). How about a compromise and do something like
{@fieldname[multi-line-code]}? Again, not familiar with the TM code, so a
few questions come to mind to maybe help better understand what you're
trying to do. Is there a restriction to a single-line embedded field with
the old way? What are the benefits (in addition to multi-line, if any)
you're trying to reap with the new way?
Leif
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raymond Irving" <xw...@ya...>
To: <dyn...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:23 PM
Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] TemplateManager new field format
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking about changing the way we now enter embed
> fields within an html template.
>
> The old way:
>
> [@fieldname]
>
> The new way:
>
> {fieldname}
>
> {fieldname[
> This is a multi-line
> embedded field tex/html block
> ]}
>
>
> Which format do you think is best?
>
>
> --
> Raymond Irving
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
> http://calendar.yahoo.com
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
> thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
> you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> Dyn...@li...
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
>
>
|