From: Leif W <war...@us...> - 2003-06-04 20:41:38
|
I haven't familiarized myself with the TM usage yet, but maybe I can be an impartial observer. The [@fieldname] is very easy to find when looking in code. I gather you think the new way you suggest could be more powerful (multi-line?). How about a compromise and do something like {@fieldname[multi-line-code]}? Again, not familiar with the TM code, so a few questions come to mind to maybe help better understand what you're trying to do. Is there a restriction to a single-line embedded field with the old way? What are the benefits (in addition to multi-line, if any) you're trying to reap with the new way? Leif ----- Original Message ----- From: "Raymond Irving" <xw...@ya...> To: <dyn...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:23 PM Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] TemplateManager new field format > Hi, > > I'm thinking about changing the way we now enter embed > fields within an html template. > > The old way: > > [@fieldname] > > The new way: > > {fieldname} > > {fieldname[ > This is a multi-line > embedded field tex/html block > ]} > > > Which format do you think is best? > > > -- > Raymond Irving > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). > http://calendar.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best > thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features > you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../ > > |