Fw: [Dynapi-Dev] set border bug

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

Fw: to Dynapi-Dev:

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevin" <ke...@ke...>
To: "Doug Melvin" <do...@cr...>
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] set border bug

> "Doug Melvin" <do...@cr...> wrote:
> 
> > I say use CSS where we can.
> > A point tho: I have yet to force mozilla to paint the right and bottom
> > borders..
> 
> It may not behave the same in IE5 IE5.5. I posted a setBorder method
> to the list that seemed to work in Moz'. Though check first what style
> getOuterHTML gives as this has come from my mini api.
> 
> p.setBorder=function(w,c,s) {
>   var width=w||0;
>   var bstyle=(typeof(s)=='string')?s:'solid';
>   var bcolor=(typeof(c)=='string')?c:'black';
>   this._border=width+'px '+bstyle+' '+bcolor;
>   this._cssBorder='border:'+this._border+'; ';
>   var s=this.css;
>   if(s) {
>     s.borderWidth=width+'px';
>     s.borderStyle=bstyle; 
>     s.borderColor=bcolor; 
>   }
> };
> 
> Kevin
> 
> > I'll post an example shortly
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Raymond Irving" <xw...@ya...>
> > To: "Dynapi-Dev" <Dyn...@li...>
> > Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 1:39 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] set border bug
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > --- Kevin <ke...@ke...> wrote:
> > > > Solution.
> > > >
> > > > 1) I like the way borders are done in dynapi for
> > > > ns4. Layers for top,
> > > > bottom, left and right. So if we implement this for
> > > > all browsers and
> > > > not mess with the style it would be consistent,
> > > > though dynlayer width
> > > > will include border.
> > >
> > > That's true, but this would require us to us more
> > > layers. The solution is ok for ns4 (as it's an old
> > > browser) but css now available I think it's much more
> > > efficient to use css.
> > >
> > > > 2) If we mess with border style for dom browsers.
> > > > For the
> > > > dynlayer size to consistent with ns4 border
> > > > implementation
> > > > it''s the dynlayer width that should be set to the
> > > > actual element
> > > > width plus twice the size of the border.
> > >
> > > If we set the actual elm size to be less than twice
> > > the border size then it would be consistent with the
> > > ns4 implementation:
> > >
> > > lyr.w = 100
> > > lyr.h = 100
> > > lyr.css.width=(lyr.w-(lyr._border*2))
> > > lyr.css.height=(lyr.h-(lyr._border*2))
> > >
> > > In the above the dynLayer width/height will always be
> > > 100x100 although the actual elm size will be 98x98.
> > > This IMO shouldn't be a problem as the content inside
> > > the elm will either wrap or overflow. This will only
> > > be true when borders are set for DynLayers on DOM
> > > browsers.
> > >
> > > Agree? Or should we use the NS4 design despite the
> > > draw backs or having to use four additional layers?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Raymond Irving
> > >
> > > > I have a setBorder method that fixes the bug and
> > > > should
> > > > work ok:
> > > >
> > > > p.setBorder=function(w,c,s) {
> > > >   var width=w||0;
> > > >   var bstyle=(typeof(s)=='string')?s:'solid';
> > > >   var bcolor=(typeof(c)=='string')?c:'black';
> > > >   this._border=width+'px '+bstyle+' '+bcolor;
> > > >   this._cssBorder='border:'+this._border+'; ';
> > > >   var s=this.css;
> > > >   if(s) {
> > > >     s.borderWidth=width+'px';
> > > >     s.borderStyle=bstyle;
> > > >     s.borderColor=bcolor;
> > > >   }
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > Just need to work out what the dynlayer w & h should
> > > > be
> > > > as the w & h of a dynlayer should be the same as
> > > > when
> > > > using a border (internal border layers) in ns4.
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > Kevin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > For example in dom browsers we would something
> > > > like:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > p.setSize = function(w,h) {
> > > > > > .....
> > > > > >    if (cw) this.css.width =
> > > > > > (this.w-(this._border*2))||0;
> > > > > >    if (ch) this.css.height =
> > > > > > (this.h-(this._border*2))||0;
> > > > > > ....
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do you think? Any other suggestions? Can we
> > > > do
> > > > > > this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Raymond Irving
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
> > > > > > http://search.yahoo.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > > > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > > > > > Dyn...@li...
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
> > > > > --
> > > > > Dan Willemsen <da...@wi...>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > > > > Dyn...@li...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > > > Dyn...@li...
> > > >
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> > > http://search.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > > Dyn...@li...
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.476 / Virus Database: 273 - Release Date: 4/24/2003
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > Dyn...@li...
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
> 