From: Kevin <ke...@ke...> - 2003-04-18 19:37:17
|
Hello Raymond, No problem with the rename - sounds good. Could dynapi.util.datasource-testfile.html show how to implement fetchpage? It's commented out at the moment. Is this possible without having to use soda - Kevin > Hello Everyone, > > I was just doing some more thinking and was wondering > if it would make sense to rename and split > soda.{whatever}.asp to something like: > > ioelmsrv.{whatever}.asp > ioelmsrv.soda.{whatever}.asp > > Where {whatever} will be replaced with jscript, > vbscript, etc > > My reason for wanting to do this is to try and make > the server-side as modular as the client. In this way > user can include the files they want from the server. > For example a user might not want to use the soda > features but would still like to enable quick and easy > dynamic client/server communications. A simple > solution would be to include only the > ioelmsrv.vbscript.asp file. > > In the future we hope to extend the client/server > features to support the follow: > > ioelmsrv.{whatever} // core client/server methods > ioelmsrv.ssl.{whatever} // secure socket layer > ioelmsrv.soda.{whatever} // soda methods > ioelmsrv.proxy.{whatever} // http-proxy > > What do you think? Should we go for the rename & > split? > > > -- > Raymond Irving > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo > http://search.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../ |