|
From: Kevin <ke...@ke...> - 2003-04-18 19:37:17
|
Hello Raymond,
No problem with the rename - sounds good.
Could dynapi.util.datasource-testfile.html show how
to implement fetchpage? It's commented out at the
moment. Is this possible without having to use soda
-
Kevin
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I was just doing some more thinking and was wondering
> if it would make sense to rename and split
> soda.{whatever}.asp to something like:
>
> ioelmsrv.{whatever}.asp
> ioelmsrv.soda.{whatever}.asp
>
> Where {whatever} will be replaced with jscript,
> vbscript, etc
>
> My reason for wanting to do this is to try and make
> the server-side as modular as the client. In this way
> user can include the files they want from the server.
> For example a user might not want to use the soda
> features but would still like to enable quick and easy
> dynamic client/server communications. A simple
> solution would be to include only the
> ioelmsrv.vbscript.asp file.
>
> In the future we hope to extend the client/server
> features to support the follow:
>
> ioelmsrv.{whatever} // core client/server methods
> ioelmsrv.ssl.{whatever} // secure socket layer
> ioelmsrv.soda.{whatever} // soda methods
> ioelmsrv.proxy.{whatever} // http-proxy
>
> What do you think? Should we go for the rename &
> split?
>
>
> --
> Raymond Irving
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
> http://search.yahoo.com
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> Dyn...@li...
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
|