From: Raymond I. <xw...@ya...> - 2003-04-18 02:44:58
|
Hello Everyone, I was just doing some more thinking and was wondering if it would make sense to rename and split soda.{whatever}.asp to something like: ioelmsrv.{whatever}.asp ioelmsrv.soda.{whatever}.asp Where {whatever} will be replaced with jscript, vbscript, etc My reason for wanting to do this is to try and make the server-side as modular as the client. In this way user can include the files they want from the server. For example a user might not want to use the soda features but would still like to enable quick and easy dynamic client/server communications. A simple solution would be to include only the ioelmsrv.vbscript.asp file. In the future we hope to extend the client/server features to support the follow: ioelmsrv.{whatever} // core client/server methods ioelmsrv.ssl.{whatever} // secure socket layer ioelmsrv.soda.{whatever} // soda methods ioelmsrv.proxy.{whatever} // http-proxy What do you think? Should we go for the rename & split? -- Raymond Irving __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com |