|
From: Raymond I. <xw...@ya...> - 2003-04-18 02:44:58
|
Hello Everyone,
I was just doing some more thinking and was wondering
if it would make sense to rename and split
soda.{whatever}.asp to something like:
ioelmsrv.{whatever}.asp
ioelmsrv.soda.{whatever}.asp
Where {whatever} will be replaced with jscript,
vbscript, etc
My reason for wanting to do this is to try and make
the server-side as modular as the client. In this way
user can include the files they want from the server.
For example a user might not want to use the soda
features but would still like to enable quick and easy
dynamic client/server communications. A simple
solution would be to include only the
ioelmsrv.vbscript.asp file.
In the future we hope to extend the client/server
features to support the follow:
ioelmsrv.{whatever} // core client/server methods
ioelmsrv.ssl.{whatever} // secure socket layer
ioelmsrv.soda.{whatever} // soda methods
ioelmsrv.proxy.{whatever} // http-proxy
What do you think? Should we go for the rename &
split?
--
Raymond Irving
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com
|