From: Benoit M. <mar...@ma...> - 2003-04-17 00:52:38
|
I think we should, even if it doesn't change the work you have to do, it's less "scary" to deal with merging changes in a separate file rather than in dynapi.js, My 2 cents, Benoit On Wednesday, April 16, 2003, at 04:15 PM, Raymond Irving wrote: > > --- Dan Willemsen <da...@wi...> wrote: >> On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 08:50, Raymond Irving wrote: >>> --- Dan Willemsen <da...@wi...> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 22:59, Raymond Irving >> wrote: >>>>> It also makes upgrading dynapi a lot more >> easier. >>>> How? Wouldn't the user still have to update the >> new >>>> packages.js file? Or >>>> even, between upgrades, a change in one of the >>>> widgets, or an additional >>>> one, all these examples would need a new >> packages.js >>>> i would think. >>> >>> With this method the user now controls the >> packages >>> separately from the dynapi.js file. This will be >> very >>> useful in production environments were customized >>> packages are needed. The user can now freely >> update >>> the dynapi.js file without having to worry about >>> packages been overwritten. >> Except they would still have to worry about the >> packages.js file being >> overwritten, right? > > Yes, but even if they do, it's easier for them to just > simply restore their packages.js and not worry about > any code changes, as oppose to them restoring or > modifying the dynapi.js, which might have some > critical changes. > > Besides that it makes the dynapi.js looks smaller :) > > Agree? Should we implement this package feature? Or is > it six-of-one and half-dozen of the other? > > -- > Raymond Irving > > >> -- >> Dan Willemsen <da...@wi...> >> > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo > http://search.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../ > |