From: Dan W. <da...@wi...> - 2003-04-16 21:23:23
|
On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 08:50, Raymond Irving wrote: > --- Dan Willemsen <da...@wi...> wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 22:59, Raymond Irving wrote: > > > It also makes upgrading dynapi a lot more easier. > > How? Wouldn't the user still have to update the new > > packages.js file? Or > > even, between upgrades, a change in one of the > > widgets, or an additional > > one, all these examples would need a new packages.js > > i would think. > > With this method the user now controls the packages > separately from the dynapi.js file. This will be very > useful in production environments were customized > packages are needed. The user can now freely update > the dynapi.js file without having to worry about > packages been overwritten. Except they would still have to worry about the packages.js file being overwritten, right? -- Dan Willemsen <da...@wi...> |