Re: [Dynapi-Dev] No comments? No Votes?

[Doug M. <do...@cr...>]

Regardless of naming convention, I intend to only produce light widgets =
at first.
This will allow a larger number of widgets to be completed and realeases =
(and tested)
in as short a time as possable.
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Doug Melvin=20
  To: dyn...@li...=20
  Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 6:20 PM
  Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] No comments? No Votes?


  Lacking a response I will work on a scroll pane light.
  Features will include:
  Overloaded setHTML and addChild (too sethtml or add children directly =
to the display area)
  Overloaded setSize function to automatically scale the scroll knobs =
(if the option is set)


  I would like feedback on nameing conventions of gui components as it =
is soon enough to change what I'm using:
  Option A) which I am currently using
  1) Widget_light : a widghet which is a light-weight as possable
  2) WIdget : a widget wich is a little more heavy, has images/skinnable
  3) Widget_advanced: a widget with added features not normally required =

      I.E. -an autoscroll feature (when the mouse is simply over the =
button, invoke the scrolling)
            -a continuous scroll feature where the scroll keeps going =
while you hold mousebutton down on the scrol button

  Otion b)
  1) Widget : a widget which is a light-weight as possable (default)
  2) Wiget_skinned : a widget wich is a little more heavy, has =
images/skinnable
  3) Widget_advanced: a widget with added features not normally required =

      I.E. -an autoscroll feature (when the mouse is simply over the =
button, invoke the scrolling)
            -a continuous scroll feature where the scroll keeps going =
while you hold mousebutton down on the scrol button

  ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: Doug Melvin=20
    To: dyn...@li...=20
    Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 6:09 PM
    Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] No comments? No Votes?


    <tap tap tap> is this thing on?