From: Bart B. <ba...@ho...> - 2000-11-25 11:11:08
|
Well as I wrote it is done the same way that dynlayer will initialize function widget(){ this.construct(arguments) // rest of your code } -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: Pascal Bestebroer <pa...@dy...> Till: dyn...@li... <dyn...@li...> Datum: den 24 november 2000 18:17 Ämne: RE: Re: SV: [Dynapi-Dev] Widget constructor >but how would you want to handle widget-specific initialisation? > > >Pascal Bestebroer >pa...@dy... >http://www.dynamic-core.net > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: dyn...@li... >> [mailto:dyn...@li...]Namens Barre Bizon >> Verzonden: vrijdag 24 november 2000 11:35 >> Aan: dyn...@li... >> Onderwerp: Re: Re: SV: [Dynapi-Dev] Widget constructor >> >> >> hmm seems kindof obscure.. >> It strikes me as having a construct method to be a cleaner >> way of doing initialization.. almost like calling super() >> in Java... hm? >> (The code below should work) >> >> function DynLayer() { this.construct(arguments) } >> DynLayer.prototype.construct=function(){ >> var a=arguments[0] >> ........etc....... >> >> function widget(){ >> this.construct(arguments) >> } >> widget.prototype=new DynLayer >> >> >> > Forget what I wrote.... it should be this instead: >> > >> > function widget(argarray) { >> > this.DynLayer = DynLayer >> > eval("this.DynLayer("+argarray.join(",")+")") >> > } >> > widget.prototype = new DynLayer >> > >> > /Lunna >> > >> > At 2000-11-24 06:20 , you wrote: >> > >For that particular case, use the array's join() method. >> > > >> > >function widget(argarray) { >> > > this.DynLayer = DynLayer >> > > this.DynLayer(argarray.join(",")) >> > >} >> > >widget.prototype = new DynLayer >> > > >> > >/Lunna >> > > >> > >At 2000-11-24 02:07 , you wrote: >> > >>Hmm... does not seem to work at all. >> > >>IE4 says it doesn't support the property or method. >> > >>Could you elaborate, or send me an example of this >> being used somewhere? >> > >>Another problem: DynLayer treats objects sent as the >> first argument as a >> > >>DynLayer object to setStyle after. >> > >>And as arrays(the array arguments in this case) are >> objects and >> > >>correspondingly are identified as such, the setStyle >> method will be called, >> > >>which is not the intent. >> > >> >> > >>/Bart >> > >> >> > >>-----Ursprungligt meddelande----- >> > >>Från: Dan Steinman <dy...@fu...> >> > >>Till: dyn...@li... <dynapi- >> de...@li...> >> > >>Datum: den 24 november 2000 01:37 >> > >>Ämne: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Widget constructor >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>>Just make your widget constructor call the DynLayer as >> a method: >> > >>> >> > >>>function widget(arguments) { >> > >>> this.DynLayer = DynLayer >> > >>> this.Dynlayer(arguments) >> > >>>} >> > >>>widget.prototype = new DynLayer >> > >>> >> > >>>Dan >> > >>> >> > >>>On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 12:39:05AM +0100, Bartek wrote: >> > >>>> I was wondering whether it is a good idea to have >> some inheritible >> > >>constructor functionality for DynLayer. >> > >>>> I want to be able to create a widget object that >> extends the DynLayer and >> > >>inherits its initialization, i.e so I wouldn't have to >> rewrite the >> > >>initialization code for the widget but instead do >> something like this: >> > >>>> >> > >>>> ------------------------------------------ >> > >>>> >> > >>>> function WidgetLayer(){ >> > >>>> this.construct(arguments) >> > >>>> } >> > >>>> WidgetLayer.prototype=new DynLayer >> > >>>> >> > >>>> ----------------------------------------------------- >> - >> > >>>> >> > >>>> and it would look something like this for dynlayer: >> > >>>> >> > >>>> ----------------------------------------------------- >> ---------------- >> > >>>> >> > >>>> function DynLayer(){ this.construct(arguments) } >> > >>>> DynLayer.prototype.construct=function(){ >> > >>>> alert() >> > >>>> var a=arguments >> > >>>> if (a.length==1 && a[0]!=null && typeof(a[0]) >> =="object") >> > >>this.setStyle(a[0]) >> > >>>> else { >> > >>>> this.id=a[0]||"JSDynLayer"+ >> (DynLayer.nullCount++) >> > >>>> this.x=a[1]||0 >> > >>>> .......etc... >> > >>>> } >> > >>>> } >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------- >> ----------------- >> > >>>> >> > >>>> I am trying to implent this as I write, to test it >> out, and I'm having >> > >>some problems. >> > >>>> Maybe there is a better way of doing this... If so , >> please let me >> > know. :) >> > >>>> Or am I on the right track? >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> /Bart >> > >>>_______________________________________________ >> > >>>Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> > >>>Dyn...@li... >> > >>>http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi- >> dev >> > >> >> > >>_______________________________________________ >> > >>Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> > >>Dyn...@li... >> > >>http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev >> > > >> > > >> > >_______________________________________________ >> > >Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> > >Dyn...@li... >> > >http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> > Dyn...@li... >> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> Dyn...@li... >> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev >> > >_______________________________________________ >Dynapi-Dev mailing list >Dyn...@li... >http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev |
From: Bart B. <ba...@ho...> - 2000-11-25 16:24:24
|
hmm... well.. actually it's going to be initialized exactly as a dynlayer .. it has some specific functionality yes, but for the most part is, in essense a dynlayer. I'll explain further: I'm creating a LayerMap for the API. That is, a layerwidget that is added on to another layer and functions as a transparent layer you can set "imagemaps" on. So it will have slightly less functionality then a dynlayer (you can't set HTML nor bgcolor etc.), and some extra stuff( event handling specific to certain areas that you set yourself etc.) -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: Pascal Bestebroer <pa...@dy...> Till: dyn...@li... <dyn...@li...> Datum: den 25 november 2000 12:33 Ämne: RE: Re: SV: [Dynapi-Dev] Widget constructor >but how to handle extra arguments specific for a widget? >the DynAPI arguments are optional, so there are not always 8 arguments for >the DynLayer (width,height,position,etc) > >there for what's the first widget argument ? > >Pascal Bestebroer >pa...@dy... >http://www.dynamic-core.net > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: dyn...@li... >> [mailto:dyn...@li...]Namens Bart Bizon >> Verzonden: zaterdag 25 november 2000 12:09 >> Aan: dyn...@li... >> Onderwerp: SV: Re: SV: [Dynapi-Dev] Widget constructor >> >> >> Well as I wrote it is done the same way that dynlayer will initialize >> >> function widget(){ >> this.construct(arguments) >> // rest of your code >> } >> >> -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- >> Från: Pascal Bestebroer <pa...@dy...> >> Till: dyn...@li... <dyn...@li...> >> Datum: den 24 november 2000 18:17 >> Ämne: RE: Re: SV: [Dynapi-Dev] Widget constructor >> >> >> >but how would you want to handle widget-specific initialisation? >> > >> > >> >Pascal Bestebroer >> >pa...@dy... >> >http://www.dynamic-core.net >> > >> >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> >> Van: dyn...@li... >> >> [mailto:dyn...@li...]Namens Barre Bizon >> >> Verzonden: vrijdag 24 november 2000 11:35 >> >> Aan: dyn...@li... >> >> Onderwerp: Re: Re: SV: [Dynapi-Dev] Widget constructor >> >> >> >> >> >> hmm seems kindof obscure.. >> >> It strikes me as having a construct method to be a cleaner >> >> way of doing initialization.. almost like calling super() >> >> in Java... hm? >> >> (The code below should work) >> >> >> >> function DynLayer() { this.construct(arguments) } >> >> DynLayer.prototype.construct=function(){ >> >> var a=arguments[0] >> >> ........etc....... >> >> >> >> function widget(){ >> >> this.construct(arguments) >> >> } >> >> widget.prototype=new DynLayer >> >> >> >> >> >> > Forget what I wrote.... it should be this instead: >> >> > >> >> > function widget(argarray) { >> >> > this.DynLayer = DynLayer >> >> > eval("this.DynLayer("+argarray.join(",")+")") >> >> > } >> >> > widget.prototype = new DynLayer >> >> > >> >> > /Lunna >> >> > >> >> > At 2000-11-24 06:20 , you wrote: >> >> > >For that particular case, use the array's join() method. >> >> > > >> >> > >function widget(argarray) { >> >> > > this.DynLayer = DynLayer >> >> > > this.DynLayer(argarray.join(",")) >> >> > >} >> >> > >widget.prototype = new DynLayer >> >> > > >> >> > >/Lunna >> >> > > >> >> > >At 2000-11-24 02:07 , you wrote: >> >> > >>Hmm... does not seem to work at all. >> >> > >>IE4 says it doesn't support the property or method. >> >> > >>Could you elaborate, or send me an example of this >> >> being used somewhere? >> >> > >>Another problem: DynLayer treats objects sent as the >> >> first argument as a >> >> > >>DynLayer object to setStyle after. >> >> > >>And as arrays(the array arguments in this case) are >> >> objects and >> >> > >>correspondingly are identified as such, the setStyle >> >> method will be called, >> >> > >>which is not the intent. >> >> > >> >> >> > >>/Bart >> >> > >> >> >> > >>-----Ursprungligt meddelande----- >> >> > >>Från: Dan Steinman <dy...@fu...> >> >> > >>Till: dyn...@li... <dynapi- >> >> de...@li...> >> >> > >>Datum: den 24 november 2000 01:37 >> >> > >>Ämne: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Widget constructor >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >>>Just make your widget constructor call the DynLayer as >> >> a method: >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>>function widget(arguments) { >> >> > >>> this.DynLayer = DynLayer >> >> > >>> this.Dynlayer(arguments) >> >> > >>>} >> >> > >>>widget.prototype = new DynLayer >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>>Dan >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>>On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 12:39:05AM +0100, Bartek wrote: >> >> > >>>> I was wondering whether it is a good idea to have >> >> some inheritible >> >> > >>constructor functionality for DynLayer. >> >> > >>>> I want to be able to create a widget object that >> >> extends the DynLayer and >> >> > >>inherits its initialization, i.e so I wouldn't have to >> >> rewrite the >> >> > >>initialization code for the widget but instead do >> >> something like this: >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> ------------------------------------------ >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> function WidgetLayer(){ >> >> > >>>> this.construct(arguments) >> >> > >>>> } >> >> > >>>> WidgetLayer.prototype=new DynLayer >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> ----------------------------------------------------- >> >> - >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> and it would look something like this for dynlayer: >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> ----------------------------------------------------- >> >> ---------------- >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> function DynLayer(){ this.construct(arguments) } >> >> > >>>> DynLayer.prototype.construct=function(){ >> >> > >>>> alert() >> >> > >>>> var a=arguments >> >> > >>>> if (a.length==1 && a[0]!=null && typeof(a[0]) >> >> =="object") >> >> > >>this.setStyle(a[0]) >> >> > >>>> else { >> >> > >>>> this.id=a[0]||"JSDynLayer"+ >> >> (DynLayer.nullCount++) >> >> > >>>> this.x=a[1]||0 >> >> > >>>> .......etc... >> >> > >>>> } >> >> > >>>> } >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> ----------------- >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> I am trying to implent this as I write, to test it >> >> out, and I'm having >> >> > >>some problems. >> >> > >>>> Maybe there is a better way of doing this... If so , >> >> please let me >> >> > know. :) >> >> > >>>> Or am I on the right track? >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> /Bart >> >> > >>>_______________________________________________ >> >> > >>>Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> >> > >>>Dyn...@li... >> >> > >>>http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi- >> >> dev >> >> > >> >> >> > >>_______________________________________________ >> >> > >>Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> >> > >>Dyn...@li... >> >> > >>http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >> >> > >Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> >> > >Dyn...@li... >> >> > >http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> >> > Dyn...@li... >> >> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> >> Dyn...@li... >> >> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev >> >> >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> >Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> >Dyn...@li... >> >http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> Dyn...@li... >> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev >> > >_______________________________________________ >Dynapi-Dev mailing list >Dyn...@li... >http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev |
From: Pascal B. <pa...@dy...> - 2000-11-25 11:33:23
|
but how to handle extra arguments specific for a widget? the DynAPI arguments are optional, so there are not always 8 arguments for the DynLayer (width,height,position,etc) there for what's the first widget argument ? Pascal Bestebroer pa...@dy... http://www.dynamic-core.net > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: dyn...@li... > [mailto:dyn...@li...]Namens Bart Bizon > Verzonden: zaterdag 25 november 2000 12:09 > Aan: dyn...@li... > Onderwerp: SV: Re: SV: [Dynapi-Dev] Widget constructor > > > Well as I wrote it is done the same way that dynlayer will initialize > > function widget(){ > this.construct(arguments) > // rest of your code > } > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Från: Pascal Bestebroer <pa...@dy...> > Till: dyn...@li... <dyn...@li...> > Datum: den 24 november 2000 18:17 > Ämne: RE: Re: SV: [Dynapi-Dev] Widget constructor > > > >but how would you want to handle widget-specific initialisation? > > > > > >Pascal Bestebroer > >pa...@dy... > >http://www.dynamic-core.net > > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > >> Van: dyn...@li... > >> [mailto:dyn...@li...]Namens Barre Bizon > >> Verzonden: vrijdag 24 november 2000 11:35 > >> Aan: dyn...@li... > >> Onderwerp: Re: Re: SV: [Dynapi-Dev] Widget constructor > >> > >> > >> hmm seems kindof obscure.. > >> It strikes me as having a construct method to be a cleaner > >> way of doing initialization.. almost like calling super() > >> in Java... hm? > >> (The code below should work) > >> > >> function DynLayer() { this.construct(arguments) } > >> DynLayer.prototype.construct=function(){ > >> var a=arguments[0] > >> ........etc....... > >> > >> function widget(){ > >> this.construct(arguments) > >> } > >> widget.prototype=new DynLayer > >> > >> > >> > Forget what I wrote.... it should be this instead: > >> > > >> > function widget(argarray) { > >> > this.DynLayer = DynLayer > >> > eval("this.DynLayer("+argarray.join(",")+")") > >> > } > >> > widget.prototype = new DynLayer > >> > > >> > /Lunna > >> > > >> > At 2000-11-24 06:20 , you wrote: > >> > >For that particular case, use the array's join() method. > >> > > > >> > >function widget(argarray) { > >> > > this.DynLayer = DynLayer > >> > > this.DynLayer(argarray.join(",")) > >> > >} > >> > >widget.prototype = new DynLayer > >> > > > >> > >/Lunna > >> > > > >> > >At 2000-11-24 02:07 , you wrote: > >> > >>Hmm... does not seem to work at all. > >> > >>IE4 says it doesn't support the property or method. > >> > >>Could you elaborate, or send me an example of this > >> being used somewhere? > >> > >>Another problem: DynLayer treats objects sent as the > >> first argument as a > >> > >>DynLayer object to setStyle after. > >> > >>And as arrays(the array arguments in this case) are > >> objects and > >> > >>correspondingly are identified as such, the setStyle > >> method will be called, > >> > >>which is not the intent. > >> > >> > >> > >>/Bart > >> > >> > >> > >>-----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > >> > >>Från: Dan Steinman <dy...@fu...> > >> > >>Till: dyn...@li... <dynapi- > >> de...@li...> > >> > >>Datum: den 24 november 2000 01:37 > >> > >>Ämne: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Widget constructor > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>>Just make your widget constructor call the DynLayer as > >> a method: > >> > >>> > >> > >>>function widget(arguments) { > >> > >>> this.DynLayer = DynLayer > >> > >>> this.Dynlayer(arguments) > >> > >>>} > >> > >>>widget.prototype = new DynLayer > >> > >>> > >> > >>>Dan > >> > >>> > >> > >>>On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 12:39:05AM +0100, Bartek wrote: > >> > >>>> I was wondering whether it is a good idea to have > >> some inheritible > >> > >>constructor functionality for DynLayer. > >> > >>>> I want to be able to create a widget object that > >> extends the DynLayer and > >> > >>inherits its initialization, i.e so I wouldn't have to > >> rewrite the > >> > >>initialization code for the widget but instead do > >> something like this: > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> ------------------------------------------ > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> function WidgetLayer(){ > >> > >>>> this.construct(arguments) > >> > >>>> } > >> > >>>> WidgetLayer.prototype=new DynLayer > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> ----------------------------------------------------- > >> - > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> and it would look something like this for dynlayer: > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> ----------------------------------------------------- > >> ---------------- > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> function DynLayer(){ this.construct(arguments) } > >> > >>>> DynLayer.prototype.construct=function(){ > >> > >>>> alert() > >> > >>>> var a=arguments > >> > >>>> if (a.length==1 && a[0]!=null && typeof(a[0]) > >> =="object") > >> > >>this.setStyle(a[0]) > >> > >>>> else { > >> > >>>> this.id=a[0]||"JSDynLayer"+ > >> (DynLayer.nullCount++) > >> > >>>> this.x=a[1]||0 > >> > >>>> .......etc... > >> > >>>> } > >> > >>>> } > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------- > >> ----------------- > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> I am trying to implent this as I write, to test it > >> out, and I'm having > >> > >>some problems. > >> > >>>> Maybe there is a better way of doing this... If so , > >> please let me > >> > know. :) > >> > >>>> Or am I on the right track? > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> /Bart > >> > >>>_______________________________________________ > >> > >>>Dynapi-Dev mailing list > >> > >>>Dyn...@li... > >> > >>>http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi- > >> dev > >> > >> > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >> > >>Dynapi-Dev mailing list > >> > >>Dyn...@li... > >> > >>http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >_______________________________________________ > >> > >Dynapi-Dev mailing list > >> > >Dyn...@li... > >> > >http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > >> > Dyn...@li... > >> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Dynapi-Dev mailing list > >> Dyn...@li... > >> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev > >> > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Dynapi-Dev mailing list > >Dyn...@li... > >http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev > |
From: Tim R. <ti...@my...> - 2000-11-25 18:58:36
|
Howdy howdy... Has anyone run into an issue where images referenced in the HTML portion of a dynlayer don't load? the rest of the layer loads, initializes, and displays, but images contained within simply never arrive? I have been using DynAPI stuff for several months; loving it. Yesterday,w e did some modem testing, and were surprised to find that instead of being slower (which we expected, obviously), certain elements in DynLayers simply never loaded at all? What's odd is that it wasn't any particular DynLayers at any given time (clearing the cache, trying again, etc.?) Anyone else run into this, or am I the lucky one? :-) Great stuff, BTW. Soon, I'll be able to send a link, so y'all can see the site. Thanks Tim Specs: Pentium 733 Mhz, 56K Modem, IE 5.0 |
From: Brandon M. <bnd...@ho...> - 2000-11-25 19:10:11
|
Does NS do the same thing? I hear that there is an IE bug with image loading inside layers. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Royal" <ti...@my...> To: <dyn...@li...> Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 1:57 PM Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] Sometimes Loads, Sometimes Not... > Howdy howdy... > > Has anyone run into an issue where images referenced in the HTML portion of > a dynlayer don't load? the rest of the layer loads, initializes, and > displays, but images contained within simply never arrive? I have been using > DynAPI stuff for several months; loving it. > > Yesterday,w e did some modem testing, and were surprised to find that > instead of being slower (which we expected, obviously), certain elements in > DynLayers simply never loaded at all? What's odd is that it wasn't any > particular DynLayers at any given time (clearing the cache, trying again, > etc.?) > > Anyone else run into this, or am I the lucky one? :-) > > Great stuff, BTW. Soon, I'll be able to send a link, so y'all can see the > site. > > Thanks > > Tim > > Specs: > > Pentium 733 Mhz, 56K Modem, IE 5.0 > > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev |
From: Tim R. <ti...@my...> - 2000-11-25 19:45:55
|
No, NS is fine. It's pretty bizarre. I've been paring down the page throughout the day to see if there's a happy medium. Darn those low bandwidth people. :-) Tim -----Original Message----- From: dyn...@li... [mailto:dyn...@li...]On Behalf Of Brandon Myers Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 11:11 AM To: dyn...@li... Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Sometimes Loads, Sometimes Not... Does NS do the same thing? I hear that there is an IE bug with image loading inside layers. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Royal" <ti...@my...> To: <dyn...@li...> Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 1:57 PM Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] Sometimes Loads, Sometimes Not... > Howdy howdy... > > Has anyone run into an issue where images referenced in the HTML portion of > a dynlayer don't load? the rest of the layer loads, initializes, and > displays, but images contained within simply never arrive? I have been using > DynAPI stuff for several months; loving it. > > Yesterday,w e did some modem testing, and were surprised to find that > instead of being slower (which we expected, obviously), certain elements in > DynLayers simply never loaded at all? What's odd is that it wasn't any > particular DynLayers at any given time (clearing the cache, trying again, > etc.?) > > Anyone else run into this, or am I the lucky one? :-) > > Great stuff, BTW. Soon, I'll be able to send a link, so y'all can see the > site. > > Thanks > > Tim > > Specs: > > Pentium 733 Mhz, 56K Modem, IE 5.0 > > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list Dyn...@li... http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev |
From: Doug M. <do...@cr...> - 2000-11-25 22:58:31
|
> No, NS is fine. It's pretty bizarre. I've been paring down the page > throughout the day to see if there's a happy medium. > > Darn those low bandwidth people. :-) I have a saying that comes to mind in these situations "Programming would be much easier without the users.. " - Doug Melvin :-) Thank you, Doug Melvin Integrated System Solutions: Design, Development, Implementation and Support Creative-Workshop.com |
From: filippo <fi...@do...> - 2000-11-27 09:48:34
|
I got into the loading image problem for IE. I was writing a series of images inside a table inside a layer forcing all the sizes, even if loaded simply didn't show them up. This problem occur me when I'm showing more then one image inside a layer. It seems IE is lazy...so I forced it to reload the table with the images inside the layer every time the DynAPI.onLoading() was fired. Simply: DynAPI.onLoading() { youlayer.setHTML(yourlayer.getHTML()) } where yourlayer is the DynLayer where you show the images nasty, but works filippo della casa > fi...@do... >> 3manos X www.doubleyou.com >>> +34 915223677 ext.16 |
From: Doug M. <do...@cr...> - 2000-11-25 19:23:44
|
I have indeed run into this. I load an html document into a loadpanel object, setting the loadpanel's size while I'm at it, and in NS one or more images will often not load. if I press refresh a few time they will eventually show up. Also: I've noticed that IE likes you to load the document into the loadpanel and THEN set the size, whereas NS prefers you Set the size irst THEN load the document.. any suggestions? comments? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Royal" <ti...@my...> To: <dyn...@li...> Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 10:57 AM Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] Sometimes Loads, Sometimes Not... > Howdy howdy... > > Has anyone run into an issue where images referenced in the HTML portion of > a dynlayer don't load? the rest of the layer loads, initializes, and > displays, but images contained within simply never arrive? I have been using > DynAPI stuff for several months; loving it. > > Yesterday,w e did some modem testing, and were surprised to find that > instead of being slower (which we expected, obviously), certain elements in > DynLayers simply never loaded at all? What's odd is that it wasn't any > particular DynLayers at any given time (clearing the cache, trying again, > etc.?) > > Anyone else run into this, or am I the lucky one? :-) > > Great stuff, BTW. Soon, I'll be able to send a link, so y'all can see the > site. > > Thanks > > Tim > > Specs: > > Pentium 733 Mhz, 56K Modem, IE 5.0 > > > > > |
From: Tim R. <ti...@my...> - 2000-11-25 19:47:51
|
Man, that's exactly what's happening with me... Hmm, I'll keep working on it and if I get any good solutions, I'll reply. That withstanding, I sure do love the DynAPI stuff. There's no way we could have done this site without it and gotten the 'coolness' factor we were told to provide. Tim -----Original Message----- From: dyn...@li... [mailto:dyn...@li...]On Behalf Of Doug Melvin Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 2:22 PM To: dyn...@li... Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Sometimes Loads, Sometimes Not... I have indeed run into this. I load an html document into a loadpanel object, setting the loadpanel's size while I'm at it, and in NS one or more images will often not load. if I press refresh a few time they will eventually show up. Also: I've noticed that IE likes you to load the document into the loadpanel and THEN set the size, whereas NS prefers you Set the size irst THEN load the document.. any suggestions? comments? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Royal" <ti...@my...> To: <dyn...@li...> Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 10:57 AM Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] Sometimes Loads, Sometimes Not... > Howdy howdy... > > Has anyone run into an issue where images referenced in the HTML portion of > a dynlayer don't load? the rest of the layer loads, initializes, and > displays, but images contained within simply never arrive? I have been using > DynAPI stuff for several months; loving it. > > Yesterday,w e did some modem testing, and were surprised to find that > instead of being slower (which we expected, obviously), certain elements in > DynLayers simply never loaded at all? What's odd is that it wasn't any > particular DynLayers at any given time (clearing the cache, trying again, > etc.?) > > Anyone else run into this, or am I the lucky one? :-) > > Great stuff, BTW. Soon, I'll be able to send a link, so y'all can see the > site. > > Thanks > > Tim > > Specs: > > Pentium 733 Mhz, 56K Modem, IE 5.0 > > > > > _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list Dyn...@li... http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev |