Just look at my browser.js that is included same thing!
BTW I don't have the superclass but could I interest you in my OOJS?
8an
-----Original Message-----
From: dyn...@li...
[mailto:dyn...@li...]On Behalf Of Michael
Pemberton
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 4:40 PM
To: dyn...@li...
Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] Browser.js variation
As the topic of ns6 was being dicussed, I had a look as the browser.js
file. I've attached a variation that I've implemented in my own version
of the API. I didn't need the Browser() function anywhere else but
"is". So I decided to create a single object instead of creating a
class and them instantiating that class as "is".
If my logic is wrong, please tell me.
--
Michael Pemberton
mp...@ph...
ICQ: 12107010
|
