Menu
▾
▴
dynapi-dev
|
From: Kevin <ke...@ke...> - 2003-04-06 15:52:47
|
Hello, If elements are removed and then some more are added we may have a memory leak. Using Mozilla and example: dynapi.api.dynlayer-destroy.html the elements aren't removed when the Destroy all link is clicked. Suggested fix dynlayer_base.js:p._remove -this.elm.innerHTML = ""; -this.elm.outerHTML = ""; +//this.elm.innerHTML = ""; +//this.elm.outerHTML = ""; +var p=this.parent.elm; +if(p) p.removeChild(this.elm); This seems to work fine in IE too.. NS4 has a recycled array in dynlayer_ns4.js:p._remove but I don't see the space reused. Do we have growing memory here and perhaps the Layer should be deleted rather than hidden? - Kevin. |
|
From: Raymond I. <xw...@ya...> - 2003-04-06 18:49:46
|
See below: --- Kevin <ke...@ke...> wrote: > Hello, > > If elements are removed and then some more are added > we may have a memory leak. Using Mozilla and > example: > dynapi.api.dynlayer-destroy.html > the elements aren't removed when the Destroy all > link is > clicked. > > Suggested fix > dynlayer_base.js:p._remove > > -this.elm.innerHTML = ""; > -this.elm.outerHTML = ""; > +//this.elm.innerHTML = ""; > +//this.elm.outerHTML = ""; > +var p=this.parent.elm; > +if(p) p.removeChild(this.elm); > > This seems to work fine in IE too.. I've added the above as well. > NS4 has a recycled array in > dynlayer_ns4.js:p._remove > but I don't see the space reused. Do we have growing > memory here and perhaps the Layer should be deleted > rather than hidden? Well, IMO if they're stored inside a recycle array then they should be reused. Any ideas on how we should do this? -- Raymond Irving > - > Kevin. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of > bandwidth! > No other company gives more support or power for > your dedicated server > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more http://tax.yahoo.com |
|
From: Doug M. <do...@cr...> - 2003-04-07 03:00:26
|
How did we recycle in NS 4? While the memory leak was never completly fixed in NS 4, we did manage to minimize it somewhat.. Keep in mind that the content of a layer in NS 4 is also retained in memory. Simply calling setHTML() repeatedly on a layer in NS 4 will cause a memory leak. I never did find a solution for this. The best I was able to do was reduce the amount of content that was being set each time. > See below: > > --- Kevin <ke...@ke...> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > If elements are removed and then some more are added > > we may have a memory leak. Using Mozilla and > > example: > > dynapi.api.dynlayer-destroy.html > > the elements aren't removed when the Destroy all > > link is > > clicked. > > > > Suggested fix > > dynlayer_base.js:p._remove > > > > -this.elm.innerHTML = ""; > > -this.elm.outerHTML = ""; > > +//this.elm.innerHTML = ""; > > +//this.elm.outerHTML = ""; > > +var p=this.parent.elm; > > +if(p) p.removeChild(this.elm); > > > > This seems to work fine in IE too.. > > I've added the above as well. > > > NS4 has a recycled array in > > dynlayer_ns4.js:p._remove > > but I don't see the space reused. Do we have growing > > memory here and perhaps the Layer should be deleted > > rather than hidden? > > Well, IMO if they're stored inside a recycle array > then they should be reused. Any ideas on how we should > do this? > > -- > Raymond Irving > > > - > > Kevin. > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of > > bandwidth! > > No other company gives more support or power for > > your dedicated server > > > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > > Dyn...@li... > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../ > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more > http://tax.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../ > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.463 / Virus Database: 262 - Release Date: 3/17/2003 |
|
From: Kevin <ke...@ke...> - 2003-04-07 22:18:58
|
See below: "Raymond Irving" <xw...@ya...> wrote: > See below: > > --- Kevin <ke...@ke...> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > If elements are removed and then some more are added > > we may have a memory leak. Using Mozilla and > > example: > > dynapi.api.dynlayer-destroy.html > > the elements aren't removed when the Destroy all > > link is > > clicked. > > > > Suggested fix > > dynlayer_base.js:p._remove > > > > -this.elm.innerHTML = ""; > > -this.elm.outerHTML = ""; > > +//this.elm.innerHTML = ""; > > +//this.elm.outerHTML = ""; > > +var p=this.parent.elm; > > +if(p) p.removeChild(this.elm); > > > > This seems to work fine in IE too.. > > I've added the above as well. > > > NS4 has a recycled array in > > dynlayer_ns4.js:p._remove > > but I don't see the space reused. Do we have growing > > memory here and perhaps the Layer should be deleted > > rather than hidden? > > Well, IMO if they're stored inside a recycle array > then they should be reused. Any ideas on how we should > do this? No ideas as we do, new Layer() or delete and not an OS specific malloc or free. NS4 may have memory management bugs as Doug says. Who implemented the recycled array? Perhaps it was an NS4 bug work around, as doing a delete on a Layer was proven to be bad news? - Kevin > -- > Raymond Irving > > > - > > Kevin. > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of > > bandwidth! > > No other company gives more support or power for > > your dedicated server > > > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > > Dyn...@li... > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../ > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more > http://tax.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../ |
|
From: Doug M. <do...@cr...> - 2003-04-07 23:06:12
|
Ns 4 most certainly does have a memory management bug (or bugs actually)
I distincly recall several months dedicated to a work around.
The result was we implemented a recyled layer array.
In Ns when we try to deleet a DynLayer,
We simply removed it from it's parent, hid it and placed it in the recycled
array.
When creating aDynLayer in Ns 4 we first checked to see if there where any
DynLayer to recycle,
if so, we used one of those instead of creating anew one.
From DynLayer.specificCreate (DynAPI 2.6)
var recycled = this.parent.doc.recycled;
if (this.created)
recycled = [];
if (recycled && recycled.length > 0) {
this.elm = recycled[recycled.length-1];
recycled.length--;
} else {
this.elm = new Layer(this.w, this.parent.elm);
this.elm.captureEvents(Event.LOAD);
this.elm.onLoad = function() {};
};
From DynLayer.specificRemove (DynAPI 2.6)
if (!this.wasBuiltInline) {
if (!this.parent.doc.recycled)
this.parent.doc.recycled = [];
this.parent.doc.recycled[this.parent.doc.recycled.length] = this.elm;
};
this.wasBuiltInline = false;
this.elm.viisibility = 'hide';
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin" <ke...@ke...>
To: "Dynapi-Dev" <Dyn...@li...>
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynLayers elements not destroyed.
> See below:
>
> "Raymond Irving" <xw...@ya...> wrote:
>
> > See below:
> >
> > --- Kevin <ke...@ke...> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > If elements are removed and then some more are added
> > > we may have a memory leak. Using Mozilla and
> > > example:
> > > dynapi.api.dynlayer-destroy.html
> > > the elements aren't removed when the Destroy all
> > > link is
> > > clicked.
> > >
> > > Suggested fix
> > > dynlayer_base.js:p._remove
> > >
> > > -this.elm.innerHTML = "";
> > > -this.elm.outerHTML = "";
> > > +//this.elm.innerHTML = "";
> > > +//this.elm.outerHTML = "";
> > > +var p=this.parent.elm;
> > > +if(p) p.removeChild(this.elm);
> > >
> > > This seems to work fine in IE too..
> >
> > I've added the above as well.
> >
> > > NS4 has a recycled array in
> > > dynlayer_ns4.js:p._remove
> > > but I don't see the space reused. Do we have growing
> > > memory here and perhaps the Layer should be deleted
> > > rather than hidden?
> >
> > Well, IMO if they're stored inside a recycle array
> > then they should be reused. Any ideas on how we should
> > do this?
>
> No ideas as we do, new Layer() or delete and not an OS
> specific malloc or free. NS4 may have memory management
> bugs as Doug says. Who implemented the recycled array?
> Perhaps it was an NS4 bug work around, as doing a delete
> on a Layer was proven to be bad news?
>
> -
> Kevin
>
> > --
> > Raymond Irving
> >
> > > -
> > > Kevin.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> > > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of
> > > bandwidth!
> > > No other company gives more support or power for
> > > your dedicated server
> > >
> > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > > Dyn...@li...
> > >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
> > http://tax.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
> > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
> > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > Dyn...@li...
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
> No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> Dyn...@li...
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.463 / Virus Database: 262 - Release Date: 3/17/2003
|
|
From: Raymond I. <xw...@ya...> - 2003-04-07 23:23:59
|
Please see below:
--- Doug Melvin <do...@cr...> wrote:
> Ns 4 most certainly does have a memory management
> bug (or bugs actually)
> I distincly recall several months dedicated to a
> work around.
> The result was we implemented a recyled layer array.
> In Ns when we try to deleet a DynLayer,
> We simply removed it from it's parent, hid it and
> placed it in the recycled
> array.
> When creating aDynLayer in Ns 4 we first checked to
> see if there where any
> DynLayer to recycle,
> if so, we used one of those instead of creating anew
> one.
>
> From DynLayer.specificCreate (DynAPI 2.6)
> var recycled = this.parent.doc.recycled;
> if (this.created)
> recycled = [];
> if (recycled && recycled.length > 0) {
> this.elm = recycled[recycled.length-1];
> recycled.length--;
> } else {
> this.elm = new Layer(this.w, this.parent.elm);
> this.elm.captureEvents(Event.LOAD);
> this.elm.onLoad = function() {};
> };
>
> From DynLayer.specificRemove (DynAPI 2.6)
> if (!this.wasBuiltInline) {
> if (!this.parent.doc.recycled)
> this.parent.doc.recycled = [];
>
>
this.parent.doc.recycled[this.parent.doc.recycled.length]
> = this.elm;
> };
> this.wasBuiltInline = false;
> this.elm.viisibility = 'hide';
Wow! The question now is who will implement this
feature into the dynlayer_ns4.js file?
--
Raymond Irving
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin" <ke...@ke...>
> To: "Dynapi-Dev" <Dyn...@li...>
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 3:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynLayers elements not
> destroyed.
>
>
> > See below:
> >
> > "Raymond Irving" <xw...@ya...> wrote:
> >
> > > See below:
> > >
> > > --- Kevin <ke...@ke...> wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > If elements are removed and then some more are
> added
> > > > we may have a memory leak. Using Mozilla and
> > > > example:
> > > > dynapi.api.dynlayer-destroy.html
> > > > the elements aren't removed when the Destroy
> all
> > > > link is
> > > > clicked.
> > > >
> > > > Suggested fix
> > > > dynlayer_base.js:p._remove
> > > >
> > > > -this.elm.innerHTML = "";
> > > > -this.elm.outerHTML = "";
> > > > +//this.elm.innerHTML = "";
> > > > +//this.elm.outerHTML = "";
> > > > +var p=this.parent.elm;
> > > > +if(p) p.removeChild(this.elm);
> > > >
> > > > This seems to work fine in IE too..
> > >
> > > I've added the above as well.
> > >
> > > > NS4 has a recycled array in
> > > > dynlayer_ns4.js:p._remove
> > > > but I don't see the space reused. Do we have
> growing
> > > > memory here and perhaps the Layer should be
> deleted
> > > > rather than hidden?
> > >
> > > Well, IMO if they're stored inside a recycle
> array
> > > then they should be reused. Any ideas on how we
> should
> > > do this?
> >
> > No ideas as we do, new Layer() or delete and not
> an OS
> > specific malloc or free. NS4 may have memory
> management
> > bugs as Doug says. Who implemented the recycled
> array?
> > Perhaps it was an NS4 bug work around, as doing a
> delete
> > on a Layer was proven to be bad news?
> >
> > -
> > Kevin
> >
> > > --
> > > Raymond Irving
> > >
> > > > -
> > > > Kevin.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> > > > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB
> of
> > > > bandwidth!
> > > > No other company gives more support or power
> for
> > > > your dedicated server
> > > >
> > >
>
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > > > Dyn...@li...
> > > >
> > >
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
> > >
> > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators,
> forms, and more
> > > http://tax.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> > > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of
> bandwidth!
> > > No other company gives more support or power for
> your dedicated server
> > >
>
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > > Dyn...@li...
> > >
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of
> bandwidth!
> > No other company gives more support or power for
> your dedicated server
> >
>
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > Dyn...@li...
> >
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
> >
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system
> (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.463 / Virus Database: 262 - Release
> Date: 3/17/2003
>
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of
> bandwidth!
> No other company gives more support or power for
> your dedicated server
>
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> Dyn...@li...
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
|
|
From: Doug M. <do...@cr...> - 2003-04-07 23:35:44
|
Currently I am dubugging a problem with the graphics object.
It seems that the vml shape triggers mouse events..
unfortunatly the mouse fil in IE faile miserably..
the line: (82)
var tt=target.type;
throws an error of "Failed" when you run the mouse over the shape you have
drawn with the vml object.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raymond Irving" <xw...@ya...>
To: "Dynapi-Dev" <Dyn...@li...>
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynLayers elements not destroyed.
>
> Please see below:
>
> --- Doug Melvin <do...@cr...> wrote:
> > Ns 4 most certainly does have a memory management
> > bug (or bugs actually)
> > I distincly recall several months dedicated to a
> > work around.
> > The result was we implemented a recyled layer array.
> > In Ns when we try to deleet a DynLayer,
> > We simply removed it from it's parent, hid it and
> > placed it in the recycled
> > array.
> > When creating aDynLayer in Ns 4 we first checked to
> > see if there where any
> > DynLayer to recycle,
> > if so, we used one of those instead of creating anew
> > one.
> >
> > From DynLayer.specificCreate (DynAPI 2.6)
> > var recycled = this.parent.doc.recycled;
> > if (this.created)
> > recycled = [];
> > if (recycled && recycled.length > 0) {
> > this.elm = recycled[recycled.length-1];
> > recycled.length--;
> > } else {
> > this.elm = new Layer(this.w, this.parent.elm);
> > this.elm.captureEvents(Event.LOAD);
> > this.elm.onLoad = function() {};
> > };
> >
> > From DynLayer.specificRemove (DynAPI 2.6)
> > if (!this.wasBuiltInline) {
> > if (!this.parent.doc.recycled)
> > this.parent.doc.recycled = [];
> >
> >
> this.parent.doc.recycled[this.parent.doc.recycled.length]
> > = this.elm;
> > };
> > this.wasBuiltInline = false;
> > this.elm.viisibility = 'hide';
>
> Wow! The question now is who will implement this
> feature into the dynlayer_ns4.js file?
>
> --
> Raymond Irving
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Kevin" <ke...@ke...>
> > To: "Dynapi-Dev" <Dyn...@li...>
> > Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 3:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] DynLayers elements not
> > destroyed.
> >
> >
> > > See below:
> > >
> > > "Raymond Irving" <xw...@ya...> wrote:
> > >
> > > > See below:
> > > >
> > > > --- Kevin <ke...@ke...> wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > If elements are removed and then some more are
> > added
> > > > > we may have a memory leak. Using Mozilla and
> > > > > example:
> > > > > dynapi.api.dynlayer-destroy.html
> > > > > the elements aren't removed when the Destroy
> > all
> > > > > link is
> > > > > clicked.
> > > > >
> > > > > Suggested fix
> > > > > dynlayer_base.js:p._remove
> > > > >
> > > > > -this.elm.innerHTML = "";
> > > > > -this.elm.outerHTML = "";
> > > > > +//this.elm.innerHTML = "";
> > > > > +//this.elm.outerHTML = "";
> > > > > +var p=this.parent.elm;
> > > > > +if(p) p.removeChild(this.elm);
> > > > >
> > > > > This seems to work fine in IE too..
> > > >
> > > > I've added the above as well.
> > > >
> > > > > NS4 has a recycled array in
> > > > > dynlayer_ns4.js:p._remove
> > > > > but I don't see the space reused. Do we have
> > growing
> > > > > memory here and perhaps the Layer should be
> > deleted
> > > > > rather than hidden?
> > > >
> > > > Well, IMO if they're stored inside a recycle
> > array
> > > > then they should be reused. Any ideas on how we
> > should
> > > > do this?
> > >
> > > No ideas as we do, new Layer() or delete and not
> > an OS
> > > specific malloc or free. NS4 may have memory
> > management
> > > bugs as Doug says. Who implemented the recycled
> > array?
> > > Perhaps it was an NS4 bug work around, as doing a
> > delete
> > > on a Layer was proven to be bad news?
> > >
> > > -
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > > --
> > > > Raymond Irving
> > > >
> > > > > -
> > > > > Kevin.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> > > > > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB
> > of
> > > > > bandwidth!
> > > > > No other company gives more support or power
> > for
> > > > > your dedicated server
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> > > > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > > > > Dyn...@li...
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators,
> > forms, and more
> > > > http://tax.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> > > > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of
> > bandwidth!
> > > > No other company gives more support or power for
> > your dedicated server
> > > >
> >
> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > > > Dyn...@li...
> > > >
> >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> > > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of
> > bandwidth!
> > > No other company gives more support or power for
> > your dedicated server
> > >
> >
> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > > Dyn...@li...
> > >
> >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system
> > (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.463 / Virus Database: 262 - Release
> > Date: 3/17/2003
> >
> >
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of
> > bandwidth!
> > No other company gives more support or power for
> > your dedicated server
> >
> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > Dyn...@li...
> >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
> http://tax.yahoo.com
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
> No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> Dyn...@li...
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dyn...@li.../
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.463 / Virus Database: 262 - Release Date: 3/17/2003
|
|
From: Doug M. <do...@cr...> - 2003-04-07 23:40:03
|
see below: > Currently I am dubugging a problem with the graphics object. > It seems that the vml shape triggers mouse events.. > unfortunatly the mouse fil in IE faile miserably.. > the line: (82) > var tt=target.type; > throws an error of "Failed" when you run the mouse over the shape you have > drawn with the vml object. I would like to not have to detect vml objects an reject mouse events on them, this would suck. But so far I am quite lost.. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.463 / Virus Database: 262 - Release Date: 3/17/2003 |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X