From: Pascal B. <pa...@dy...> - 2001-02-24 21:55:40
|
oops! :) Pascal Bestebroer pa...@dy... http://www.dynamic-core.net > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: dyn...@li... > [mailto:dyn...@li...]Namens Robert Rainwater > Verzonden: zaterdag 24 februari 2001 22:49 > Aan: DynAPI Development List > Onderwerp: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] setContent > > > > I was wrong. It was the new code after all. I updated cvs to fix the > calls to createElement. They now use the dynlayer method, not the > static method. > > -- > // Robert Rainwater > > On 2/24/2001, 2:54:36 PM EST, Robert wrote about "[Dynapi-Dev] > setContent": > > > > I havent tested much yet, but all of the examples that use setContent > > with labels seem to be broken (atleast in IE 55). For instance > the pushpanel and > > scrollpane examples are broken. I don't think this is new though, > > because it seems like I've noticed it before. > > > > ---------------------- > DynAPI Snapshots: http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/snapshot/ > DynAPI Homepage: http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev > |
From: Robert R. <rra...@ya...> - 2001-02-24 22:14:47
|
By the way are you still planning on putting in the dynobject? It shouldn't be very hard to implement since you have already done it in the DynaCore. But it will require that everybody includes in their pages though. -- // Robert Rainwater On 2/24/2001, 4:56:31 PM EST, Pascal wrote about "[Dynapi-Dev] setContent": > oops! :) > Pascal Bestebroer > pa...@dy... > http://www.dynamic-core.net >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: dyn...@li... >> [mailto:dyn...@li...]Namens Robert Rainwater >> Verzonden: zaterdag 24 februari 2001 22:49 >> Aan: DynAPI Development List >> Onderwerp: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] setContent >> >> >> >> I was wrong. It was the new code after all. I updated cvs to fix the >> calls to createElement. They now use the dynlayer method, not the >> static method. >> >> -- >> // Robert Rainwater >> >> On 2/24/2001, 2:54:36 PM EST, Robert wrote about "[Dynapi-Dev] >> setContent": >> >> >> > I havent tested much yet, but all of the examples that use setContent >> > with labels seem to be broken (atleast in IE 55). For instance >> the pushpanel and >> > scrollpane examples are broken. I don't think this is new though, >> > because it seems like I've noticed it before. >> >> >> >> ---------------------- >> DynAPI Snapshots: http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/snapshot/ >> DynAPI Homepage: http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dynapi-Dev mailing list >> Dyn...@li... >> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev ---------------------- DynAPI Snapshots: http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/snapshot/ DynAPI Homepage: http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/ |
From: Raymond S. <dst...@or...> - 2001-02-25 01:15:30
|
Since DynAPI3 stuck the fear of God into some individuals unnessarily, how about adopting the naming syntax used by Linux. 1) Stable releases are "even" numbered. 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, etc... 2) Working releases are "odd" numbered. 2.1, 2.3, 2.5, etc... Updates can happen to both, development can be concurrent. Odd's are more experimental in nature, and not meant for "public consumption". And this is pretty easy to understand and add to the DynAPI F.A.Q. so new users understand. Thoughts? Ray |
From: Doug M. <do...@cr...> - 2001-02-25 01:40:30
|
Sounds good to me... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Raymond Smith" <dst...@or...> To: <dyn...@li...> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 5:13 PM Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] nameology > Since DynAPI3 stuck the fear of God into some individuals unnessarily, how > about adopting the naming syntax used by Linux. > > 1) Stable releases are "even" numbered. 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, etc... > 2) Working releases are "odd" numbered. 2.1, 2.3, 2.5, etc... > > Updates can happen to both, development can be concurrent. Odd's are more > experimental in nature, and not meant for "public consumption". And this is > pretty easy to understand and add to the DynAPI F.A.Q. so new users > understand. > > Thoughts? > > Ray > > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > Dyn...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free by AVG Free Edition Download at: http://www.grisoft.com/html/us_index.cfm Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.231 / Virus Database: 112 - Release Date: 2/12/01 |