From: Mark E. (Embarcadero) <med...@us...> - 2010-07-07 20:04:52
|
Hi Paul, I was wondering if you could give us a Status update on the DUnit2 merge. Thanks, Mark On 11/23/2009 2:30 PM, Paul Spain wrote: > ok. I'm fine with that and will tag prior to commting any > DUnit2-related material on the trunk. > My concern was disrupting anybody working off the head - but I guess > that's life on the bleeding edge... > > Cheer, Paul. > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Mark Edington (Embarcadero) > <med...@us... > <mailto:med...@us...>> wrote: > > On 11/23/2009 2:24 AM, Kris Golko wrote: >> I suggest we _tag_ the source after Embarcadero changes are >> complete. Then, we can procede with merging DUnit2 changes. >> I don't see a point in branching, as we don't need to develop two >> source streams. A tag can be used as a brach if such need arises. >> > > I don't have any other changes to commit from Embarcadero at this > time. > > I'm inclined to agree with Kris about using a tag for DUnit1 > instead of branching to do the DUnit2 the merge. It'll be less > work that way and also keep the important change history on the trunk. > > Mark > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports > 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - > and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Dunit-interest mailing list > Dun...@li... > <mailto:Dun...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest > > |