From: Kris G. <krz...@ya...> - 2009-11-23 10:24:57
|
Hi All, I suggest we _tag_ the source after Embarcadero changes are complete. Then, we can procede with merging DUnit2 changes. I don't see a point in branching, as we don't need to develop two source streams. A tag can be used as a brach if such need arises. Cheers --- En date de : Dim 22.11.09, Juancarlo Añez <ap...@gm...> a écrit : De: Juancarlo Añez <ap...@gm...> Objet: Re: [DUnit-interest] DUnit2 merge progress... À: pv...@gm..., "Users of the DUnit Xtreme testing framework for Delphi" <dun...@li...> Cc: "Mark Edington" <Mar...@em...> Date: Dimanche 22 Novembre 2009, 14h20 FWIW, there were changes made by CodeGear to the trunk a few days ago. I agree with creating a branch for DUnit2, and merging/adapting there changes to the trunk until DUnit2 can be released. --Juanca On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Paul Spain <pv...@gm...> wrote: Thanks Mark. I've been thinking about how best to do the merge. I think the least impact approach is to create a branch for the DUnit2 stuff, and merge that back to the trunk when its all reconciled. Knitting the documentation for both versions hasn't begun. As the next DUnit release will be the first in quite a while, it should be cohesive for any newcomers and those having another look. The trunk may be unusable for a while if the merging happens there. Anyone interesed in the DUnit2 code during the merge can always switch sandboxes to that branch. Any mods to DUnit1 inbetween times can continue in the trunk. Cheers, Paul. On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Mark Edington <Mar...@em...> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > It's checked in. Rev 27. > > Are you going to merge the changes into the trunk? > > We can tag and branch from that revision for ongoing DUnit1 fixes if needed. > > Mark > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Spain [mailto:pv...@gm...] > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 5:50 PM > To: Mark Edington (Embarcadero) > Subject: Fwd: [DUnit-interest] DUnit2 merge progress... > > Hi Mark, > > I'm ready to bring the DUnit2 code across to the DUnit repository. > Do you have time to commit the CodeGear changes to the public DUnit beforehand, or could I help out with that? > > Cheers, Paul. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Paul Spain <pv...@gm...> > Date: Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:27 PM > Subject: Re: [DUnit-interest] DUnit2 merge progress... > To: "Mark Edington (Embarcadero)" <med...@us...> > Cc: Users of the DUnit Xtreme testing framework for Delphi <dun...@li...> > > > Thanks Mark. I tried checking out against that URL yesterday a few times and it failed with a message stating the project address was known but there was some issue with the content. I assumed it was a template address for each SF project, that may not resolve for CVS-based repositories. In any case, its working now! > > We have a job in front of us adding our respective dunit mods to the repository. It may be easier if you go first, as adding the CodeGear mods against dunit would be simpler than patching the functionality to Peter M's re-written dunit2. > If you have any unit tests for the new functionality, would you please add them as well? > > Meanwhile, I'm creating a repository on SF dunit2 from Peter M's last version through to what we are using now in the tiOPFproject. > > Cheers, Paul. > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Mark Edington (Embarcadero) <med...@us...> wrote: >> On 11/5/2009 10:34 PM, Paul Spain wrote: >>> >>> I think >>> it would ease future development if we moved to Subversion as >>> discussed in the earlier thread. >>> >> >> Jud already "moved" the main repository to Subversion back in April of >> 2008. >> >> The URL is on this page: >> >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/dunit/develop >> >> Mark >> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Dunit-interest mailing list Dun...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest -- Juanca -----La pièce jointe associée suit----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july -----La pièce jointe associée suit----- _______________________________________________ Dunit-interest mailing list Dun...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest |