Menu
▾
▴
dunit-interest
|
From: Paul S. <pv...@gm...> - 2009-11-06 06:34:51
|
Hi there, I have been working on consolidating Peter McNab's DUnit2 from a number of forks. I work with Peter Hinrichsen who posted earlier about the DUnit2 development for the tiOPF project. I also worked with Peter McNab for a number of years. I am happy to merge this code with DUnit as there has been a sudden and serendipitous burst of life here on DUnit. I have contributed code to this project in the past (a Delphi test-creation plugin before Borland include this feature in the IDE). So I assume I still have write access to the CVS repository. I think it would ease future development if we moved to Subversion as discussed in the earlier thread. However, I can see no way of creating a Subversion repository for DUnit with the project permissions I have - that looks like a job for an admin. From Googling, it seems to be possible to run CVS and Subversion simultaneously on Sourceforge projects in a transition period. In the meantime, I have created a temporary DUnit2 SF project to host the DUnit2 fork, starting with Peter McNab's last version of DUnit2: https://sourceforge.net/projects/dunit2/ Peter's code is a rewrite of DUnit, but the interface is largely compatible with the last release of DUnit - from memory it was only a few hours work to migrate the tiOPF test suite. |
|
From: TRIDENT J. <tri...@ho...> - 2009-11-06 12:23:53
|
Just a suggestion, could be great to have somewhere a list of members and roles for everyone in DUnit/DUnit2 project. >From an external view, it is difficult to understand who is doing what today, and even more tomorrow ! TridenT Delphi + JavaDoc = DelphiCodeToDoc http://dephicodetodoc.sourceforge.net/ _________________________________________________________________ Nouveau Windows 7 : Simplifiez votre PC ! Trouvez le PC qui vous convient. http://clk.atdmt.com/FRM/go/181574580/direct/01/ |
|
From: Juancarlo A. <ap...@gm...> - 2009-11-06 14:03:52
|
Currently Jud Cole is the project lead, but his very busy. The rest of us are contributors to the project. I think I still keep admin rights on SourceForge in case changes are needed. It seems that most of the work is been taken care of by the tiOPF people. I think that, at least for a cycle, they or Embarcadero should designate a lead that has authoritarian powers to move things around. --Juanca On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:52 AM, TRIDENT JOB <tri...@ho...> wrote: > Just a suggestion, > > could be great to have somewhere a list of members and roles for everyone > in DUnit/DUnit2 project. > >From an external view, it is difficult to understand who is doing what > today, and even more tomorrow ! > > TridenT > Delphi + JavaDoc = DelphiCodeToDoc > http://dephicodetodoc.sourceforge.net/ > > > ------------------------------ > Nouveau Windows 7 : Simplifiez votre PC ! Trouvez le PC qui vous convient.<http://clk.atdmt.com/FRM/go/181574580/direct/01/> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Dunit-interest mailing list > Dun...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest > > -- Juanca |
|
From: Mark E. (Embarcadero) <med...@us...> - 2009-11-06 16:38:55
|
On 11/5/2009 10:34 PM, Paul Spain wrote: > I think > it would ease future development if we moved to Subversion as > discussed in the earlier thread. > Jud already "moved" the main repository to Subversion back in April of 2008. The URL is on this page: https://sourceforge.net/projects/dunit/develop Mark |
|
From: Paul S. <pv...@gm...> - 2009-11-07 04:27:44
|
Thanks Mark. I tried checking out against that URL yesterday a few times and it failed with a message stating the project address was known but there was some issue with the content. I assumed it was a template address for each SF project, that may not resolve for CVS-based repositories. In any case, its working now! We have a job in front of us adding our respective dunit mods to the repository. It may be easier if you go first, as adding the CodeGear mods against dunit would be simpler than patching the functionality to Peter M's re-written dunit2. If you have any unit tests for the new functionality, would you please add them as well? Meanwhile, I'm creating a repository on SF dunit2 from Peter M's last version through to what we are using now in the tiOPFproject. Cheers, Paul. On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Mark Edington (Embarcadero) <med...@us...> wrote: > On 11/5/2009 10:34 PM, Paul Spain wrote: >> >> I think >> it would ease future development if we moved to Subversion as >> discussed in the earlier thread. >> > > Jud already "moved" the main repository to Subversion back in April of > 2008. > > The URL is on this page: > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/dunit/develop > > Mark > |
|
From: Krzysztof G. <krz...@ya...> - 2009-11-08 14:18:05
|
Paul,Please try https://dunit.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/dunit/trunk Cheers --- En date de : Sam 7.11.09, Paul Spain <pv...@gm...> a écrit : De: Paul Spain <pv...@gm...> Objet: Re: [DUnit-interest] DUnit2 merge progress... À: "Mark Edington (Embarcadero)" <med...@us...> Cc: "Users of the DUnit Xtreme testing framework for Delphi" <dun...@li...> Date: Samedi 7 Novembre 2009, 4h27 Thanks Mark. I tried checking out against that URL yesterday a few times and it failed with a message stating the project address was known but there was some issue with the content. I assumed it was a template address for each SF project, that may not resolve for CVS-based repositories. In any case, its working now! We have a job in front of us adding our respective dunit mods to the repository. It may be easier if you go first, as adding the CodeGear mods against dunit would be simpler than patching the functionality to Peter M's re-written dunit2. If you have any unit tests for the new functionality, would you please add them as well? Meanwhile, I'm creating a repository on SF dunit2 from Peter M's last version through to what we are using now in the tiOPFproject. Cheers, Paul. On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Mark Edington (Embarcadero) <med...@us...> wrote: > On 11/5/2009 10:34 PM, Paul Spain wrote: >> >> I think >> it would ease future development if we moved to Subversion as >> discussed in the earlier thread. >> > > Jud already "moved" the main repository to Subversion back in April of > 2008. > > The URL is on this page: > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/dunit/develop > > Mark > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Dunit-interest mailing list Dun...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest |
|
From: Paul S. <pv...@gm...> - 2009-11-08 15:19:43
|
Merci Krzysztof! I think I was unclear in my response to Mark. The URL you mention was failing the other day, but was working again within a day. A Sourceforge hiccup perhaps? In any case I have a DUnit sandbox now. Cheers. A bientot, Paul. On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Krzysztof Golko <krz...@ya...>wrote: > Paul, > Please try > https://dunit.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/dunit/trunk > > > Cheers > > --- En date de : *Sam 7.11.09, Paul Spain <pv...@gm...>* a écrit : > > > De: Paul Spain <pv...@gm...> > Objet: Re: [DUnit-interest] DUnit2 merge progress... > À: "Mark Edington (Embarcadero)" <med...@us...> > Cc: "Users of the DUnit Xtreme testing framework for Delphi" < > dun...@li...> > Date: Samedi 7 Novembre 2009, 4h27 > > Thanks Mark. I tried checking out against that URL yesterday a few > times and it failed with a message stating the > project address was known but there was some issue with the content. I > assumed it was a template address for each SF project, that may not > resolve for CVS-based repositories. In any case, its working now! > > We have a job in front of us adding our respective dunit mods to the > repository. It may be easier if you go first, as adding the CodeGear > mods against dunit would be simpler than patching the functionality to > Peter M's re-written dunit2. > If you have any unit tests for the new functionality, would you please > add them as well? > > Meanwhile, I'm creating a repository on SF dunit2 from Peter M's last > version through to what we are using now in the tiOPFproject. > > Cheers, Paul. > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Mark Edington (Embarcadero) > <med...@us...<http://mc/compose?to=med...@us...>> > wrote: > > On 11/5/2009 10:34 PM, Paul Spain wrote: > >> > >> I think > >> it would ease future development if we moved to Subversion as > >> discussed in the earlier thread. > >> > > > > Jud already "moved" the main repository to Subversion back in April of > > 2008. > > > > The URL is on this page: > > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/dunit/develop > > > > Mark > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Dunit-interest mailing list > Dun...@li...<http://mc/compose?to=Dun...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest > > > |
|
From: Krzysztof G. <krz...@ya...> - 2009-11-09 11:25:40
|
Formidable! (I configured my email to get some practice in French). You can use https://dunit.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/dunit/tags/9.4.0 to get access to 9.4.0 - the latest released version. Cheers --- En date de : Dim 8.11.09, Paul Spain <pv...@gm...> a écrit : De: Paul Spain <pv...@gm...> Objet: Re: [DUnit-interest] DUnit2 merge progress... À: "Krzysztof Golko" <krz...@ya...> Cc: "Users of the DUnit Xtreme testing framework for Delphi" <dun...@li...> Date: Dimanche 8 Novembre 2009, 15h19 Merci Krzysztof! I think I was unclear in my response to Mark. The URL you mention was failing the other day, but was working again within a day. A Sourceforge hiccup perhaps? In any case I have a DUnit sandbox now. Cheers. A bientot, Paul. On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Krzysztof Golko <krz...@ya...> wrote: Paul, Please try https://dunit.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/dunit/trunk Cheers --- En date de : Sam 7.11.09, Paul Spain <pv...@gm...> a écrit : De: Paul Spain <pv...@gm...> Objet: Re: [DUnit-interest] DUnit2 merge progress... À: "Mark Edington (Embarcadero)" <med...@us...> Cc: "Users of the DUnit Xtreme testing framework for Delphi" <dun...@li...> Date: Samedi 7 Novembre 2009, 4h27 Thanks Mark. I tried checking out against that URL yesterday a few times and it failed with a message stating the project address was known but there was some issue with the content. I assumed it was a template address for each SF project, that may not resolve for CVS-based repositories. In any case, its working now! We have a job in front of us adding our respective dunit mods to the repository. It may be easier if you go first, as adding the CodeGear mods against dunit would be simpler than patching the functionality to Peter M's re-written dunit2. If you have any unit tests for the new functionality, would you please add them as well? Meanwhile, I'm creating a repository on SF dunit2 from Peter M's last version through to what we are using now in the tiOPFproject. Cheers, Paul. On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Mark Edington (Embarcadero) <med...@us...> wrote: > On 11/5/2009 10:34 PM, Paul Spain wrote: >> >> I think >> it would ease future development if we moved to Subversion as >> discussed in the earlier thread. >> > > Jud already "moved" the main repository to Subversion back in April of > 2008. > > The URL is on this page: > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/dunit/develop > > Mark > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Dunit-interest mailing list Dun...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest -----La pièce jointe associée suit----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july -----La pièce jointe associée suit----- _______________________________________________ Dunit-interest mailing list Dun...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest |
|
From: Paul S. <pv...@gm...> - 2009-11-22 12:43:05
|
Thanks Mark. I've been thinking about how best to do the merge. I think the least impact approach is to create a branch for the DUnit2 stuff, and merge that back to the trunk when its all reconciled. Knitting the documentation for both versions hasn't begun. As the next DUnit release will be the first in quite a while, it should be cohesive for any newcomers and those having another look. The trunk may be unusable for a while if the merging happens there. Anyone interesed in the DUnit2 code during the merge can always switch sandboxes to that branch. Any mods to DUnit1 inbetween times can continue in the trunk. Cheers, Paul. On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Mark Edington <Mar...@em...> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > It's checked in. Rev 27. > > Are you going to merge the changes into the trunk? > > We can tag and branch from that revision for ongoing DUnit1 fixes if needed. > > Mark > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Spain [mailto:pv...@gm...] > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 5:50 PM > To: Mark Edington (Embarcadero) > Subject: Fwd: [DUnit-interest] DUnit2 merge progress... > > Hi Mark, > > I'm ready to bring the DUnit2 code across to the DUnit repository. > Do you have time to commit the CodeGear changes to the public DUnit beforehand, or could I help out with that? > > Cheers, Paul. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Paul Spain <pv...@gm...> > Date: Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:27 PM > Subject: Re: [DUnit-interest] DUnit2 merge progress... > To: "Mark Edington (Embarcadero)" <med...@us...> > Cc: Users of the DUnit Xtreme testing framework for Delphi <dun...@li...> > > > Thanks Mark. I tried checking out against that URL yesterday a few times and it failed with a message stating the project address was known but there was some issue with the content. I assumed it was a template address for each SF project, that may not resolve for CVS-based repositories. In any case, its working now! > > We have a job in front of us adding our respective dunit mods to the repository. It may be easier if you go first, as adding the CodeGear mods against dunit would be simpler than patching the functionality to Peter M's re-written dunit2. > If you have any unit tests for the new functionality, would you please add them as well? > > Meanwhile, I'm creating a repository on SF dunit2 from Peter M's last version through to what we are using now in the tiOPFproject. > > Cheers, Paul. > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Mark Edington (Embarcadero) <med...@us...> wrote: >> On 11/5/2009 10:34 PM, Paul Spain wrote: >>> >>> I think >>> it would ease future development if we moved to Subversion as >>> discussed in the earlier thread. >>> >> >> Jud already "moved" the main repository to Subversion back in April of >> 2008. >> >> The URL is on this page: >> >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/dunit/develop >> >> Mark >> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > > |
|
From: Juancarlo A. <ap...@gm...> - 2009-11-22 14:21:23
|
FWIW, there were changes made by CodeGear to the trunk a few days ago. I agree with creating a branch for DUnit2, and merging/adapting there changes to the trunk until DUnit2 can be released. --Juanca On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Paul Spain <pv...@gm...> wrote: > Thanks Mark. > > I've been thinking about how best to do the merge. I think the least > impact approach is to create a branch for the DUnit2 stuff, and merge > that back to the trunk when its all reconciled. Knitting the > documentation for both versions hasn't begun. As the next DUnit > release will be the first in quite a while, it should be cohesive for > any newcomers and those having another look. The trunk may be unusable > for a while if the merging happens there. Anyone interesed in the > DUnit2 code during the merge can always switch sandboxes to that > branch. > > Any mods to DUnit1 inbetween times can continue in the trunk. > > Cheers, Paul. > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Mark Edington > <Mar...@em...> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > It's checked in. Rev 27. > > > > Are you going to merge the changes into the trunk? > > > > We can tag and branch from that revision for ongoing DUnit1 fixes if > needed. > > > > Mark > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Spain [mailto:pv...@gm...] > > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 5:50 PM > > To: Mark Edington (Embarcadero) > > Subject: Fwd: [DUnit-interest] DUnit2 merge progress... > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > I'm ready to bring the DUnit2 code across to the DUnit repository. > > Do you have time to commit the CodeGear changes to the public DUnit > beforehand, or could I help out with that? > > > > Cheers, Paul. > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Paul Spain <pv...@gm...> > > Date: Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:27 PM > > Subject: Re: [DUnit-interest] DUnit2 merge progress... > > To: "Mark Edington (Embarcadero)" <med...@us...> > > Cc: Users of the DUnit Xtreme testing framework for Delphi < > dun...@li...> > > > > > > Thanks Mark. I tried checking out against that URL yesterday a few times > and it failed with a message stating the project address was known but there > was some issue with the content. I assumed it was a template address for > each SF project, that may not resolve for CVS-based repositories. In any > case, its working now! > > > > We have a job in front of us adding our respective dunit mods to the > repository. It may be easier if you go first, as adding the CodeGear mods > against dunit would be simpler than patching the functionality to Peter M's > re-written dunit2. > > If you have any unit tests for the new functionality, would you please > add them as well? > > > > Meanwhile, I'm creating a repository on SF dunit2 from Peter M's last > version through to what we are using now in the tiOPFproject. > > > > Cheers, Paul. > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Mark Edington (Embarcadero) < > med...@us...> wrote: > >> On 11/5/2009 10:34 PM, Paul Spain wrote: > >>> > >>> I think > >>> it would ease future development if we moved to Subversion as > >>> discussed in the earlier thread. > >>> > >> > >> Jud already "moved" the main repository to Subversion back in April of > >> 2008. > >> > >> The URL is on this page: > >> > >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/dunit/develop > >> > >> Mark > >> > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged > information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is > prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender > by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Dunit-interest mailing list > Dun...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest > -- Juanca |
|
From: Kris G. <krz...@ya...> - 2009-11-23 10:24:57
|
Hi All, I suggest we _tag_ the source after Embarcadero changes are complete. Then, we can procede with merging DUnit2 changes. I don't see a point in branching, as we don't need to develop two source streams. A tag can be used as a brach if such need arises. Cheers --- En date de : Dim 22.11.09, Juancarlo Añez <ap...@gm...> a écrit : De: Juancarlo Añez <ap...@gm...> Objet: Re: [DUnit-interest] DUnit2 merge progress... À: pv...@gm..., "Users of the DUnit Xtreme testing framework for Delphi" <dun...@li...> Cc: "Mark Edington" <Mar...@em...> Date: Dimanche 22 Novembre 2009, 14h20 FWIW, there were changes made by CodeGear to the trunk a few days ago. I agree with creating a branch for DUnit2, and merging/adapting there changes to the trunk until DUnit2 can be released. --Juanca On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Paul Spain <pv...@gm...> wrote: Thanks Mark. I've been thinking about how best to do the merge. I think the least impact approach is to create a branch for the DUnit2 stuff, and merge that back to the trunk when its all reconciled. Knitting the documentation for both versions hasn't begun. As the next DUnit release will be the first in quite a while, it should be cohesive for any newcomers and those having another look. The trunk may be unusable for a while if the merging happens there. Anyone interesed in the DUnit2 code during the merge can always switch sandboxes to that branch. Any mods to DUnit1 inbetween times can continue in the trunk. Cheers, Paul. On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Mark Edington <Mar...@em...> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > It's checked in. Rev 27. > > Are you going to merge the changes into the trunk? > > We can tag and branch from that revision for ongoing DUnit1 fixes if needed. > > Mark > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Spain [mailto:pv...@gm...] > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 5:50 PM > To: Mark Edington (Embarcadero) > Subject: Fwd: [DUnit-interest] DUnit2 merge progress... > > Hi Mark, > > I'm ready to bring the DUnit2 code across to the DUnit repository. > Do you have time to commit the CodeGear changes to the public DUnit beforehand, or could I help out with that? > > Cheers, Paul. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Paul Spain <pv...@gm...> > Date: Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:27 PM > Subject: Re: [DUnit-interest] DUnit2 merge progress... > To: "Mark Edington (Embarcadero)" <med...@us...> > Cc: Users of the DUnit Xtreme testing framework for Delphi <dun...@li...> > > > Thanks Mark. I tried checking out against that URL yesterday a few times and it failed with a message stating the project address was known but there was some issue with the content. I assumed it was a template address for each SF project, that may not resolve for CVS-based repositories. In any case, its working now! > > We have a job in front of us adding our respective dunit mods to the repository. It may be easier if you go first, as adding the CodeGear mods against dunit would be simpler than patching the functionality to Peter M's re-written dunit2. > If you have any unit tests for the new functionality, would you please add them as well? > > Meanwhile, I'm creating a repository on SF dunit2 from Peter M's last version through to what we are using now in the tiOPFproject. > > Cheers, Paul. > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Mark Edington (Embarcadero) <med...@us...> wrote: >> On 11/5/2009 10:34 PM, Paul Spain wrote: >>> >>> I think >>> it would ease future development if we moved to Subversion as >>> discussed in the earlier thread. >>> >> >> Jud already "moved" the main repository to Subversion back in April of >> 2008. >> >> The URL is on this page: >> >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/dunit/develop >> >> Mark >> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Dunit-interest mailing list Dun...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest -- Juanca -----La pièce jointe associée suit----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july -----La pièce jointe associée suit----- _______________________________________________ Dunit-interest mailing list Dun...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest |
|
From: Mark E. (Embarcadero) <med...@us...> - 2009-11-23 20:14:32
|
On 11/23/2009 2:24 AM, Kris Golko wrote: > I suggest we _tag_ the source after Embarcadero changes are complete. > Then, we can procede with merging DUnit2 changes. > I don't see a point in branching, as we don't need to develop two > source streams. A tag can be used as a brach if such need arises. > I don't have any other changes to commit from Embarcadero at this time. I'm inclined to agree with Kris about using a tag for DUnit1 instead of branching to do the DUnit2 the merge. It'll be less work that way and also keep the important change history on the trunk. Mark |
|
From: Juancarlo A. <ap...@gm...> - 2009-11-23 21:00:42
|
FWIW, I agree with you too. --Juanca On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Mark Edington (Embarcadero) < med...@us...> wrote: > On 11/23/2009 2:24 AM, Kris Golko wrote: > > I suggest we _tag_ the source after Embarcadero changes are complete. > Then, we can procede with merging DUnit2 changes. > > I don't see a point in branching, as we don't need to develop two source > streams. A tag can be used as a brach if such need arises. > > > I don't have any other changes to commit from Embarcadero at this time. > > I'm inclined to agree with Kris about using a tag for DUnit1 instead of > branching to do the DUnit2 the merge. It'll be less work that way and also > keep the important change history on the trunk. > > Mark > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Dunit-interest mailing list > Dun...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest > > -- Juanca |
|
From: Paul S. <pv...@gm...> - 2009-11-23 22:30:36
|
ok. I'm fine with that and will tag prior to commting any DUnit2-related material on the trunk. My concern was disrupting anybody working off the head - but I guess that's life on the bleeding edge... Cheer, Paul. On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Mark Edington (Embarcadero) < med...@us...> wrote: > On 11/23/2009 2:24 AM, Kris Golko wrote: > > I suggest we _tag_ the source after Embarcadero changes are complete. > Then, we can procede with merging DUnit2 changes. > > I don't see a point in branching, as we don't need to develop two source > streams. A tag can be used as a brach if such need arises. > > > I don't have any other changes to commit from Embarcadero at this time. > > I'm inclined to agree with Kris about using a tag for DUnit1 instead of > branching to do the DUnit2 the merge. It'll be less work that way and also > keep the important change history on the trunk. > > Mark > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Dunit-interest mailing list > Dun...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest > > |
|
From: Mark E. (Embarcadero) <med...@us...> - 2010-07-07 20:04:52
|
Hi Paul, I was wondering if you could give us a Status update on the DUnit2 merge. Thanks, Mark On 11/23/2009 2:30 PM, Paul Spain wrote: > ok. I'm fine with that and will tag prior to commting any > DUnit2-related material on the trunk. > My concern was disrupting anybody working off the head - but I guess > that's life on the bleeding edge... > > Cheer, Paul. > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Mark Edington (Embarcadero) > <med...@us... > <mailto:med...@us...>> wrote: > > On 11/23/2009 2:24 AM, Kris Golko wrote: >> I suggest we _tag_ the source after Embarcadero changes are >> complete. Then, we can procede with merging DUnit2 changes. >> I don't see a point in branching, as we don't need to develop two >> source streams. A tag can be used as a brach if such need arises. >> > > I don't have any other changes to commit from Embarcadero at this > time. > > I'm inclined to agree with Kris about using a tag for DUnit1 > instead of branching to do the DUnit2 the merge. It'll be less > work that way and also keep the important change history on the trunk. > > Mark > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports > 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - > and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Dunit-interest mailing list > Dun...@li... > <mailto:Dun...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest > > |
|
From: Paul S. <pv...@gm...> - 2010-07-08 04:44:39
|
Hi Mark, Sorry about the long absence. Life keeps getting in the way... Jarrod Hollingworth and I have been committing changes to the temporary dunit2 repository here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/dunit2/ <http://sourceforge.net/projects/dunit2/>Jarrod has been making extensions for GUI testing, and we are also adding a patch by Nicholas Ring to get XMLListener working under Delphi 2010. It is still our intention to move the code over to the dunit repository. Our daytime work situation has changed recently, but I hope we can commit the changes to the dunit repository in the next month. I did make a branch in dunit earlier in the year for further changes to the original dunit1 source. As there have been trunk changes in the last couple of months, I will create a new branch for dunit1 development immediately prior to committing the dunit2 changes to the trunk. Cheers, Paul. On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Mark Edington (Embarcadero) < med...@us...> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > I was wondering if you could give us a Status update on the DUnit2 merge. > > Thanks, > > Mark > > On 11/23/2009 2:30 PM, Paul Spain wrote: > > ok. I'm fine with that and will tag prior to commting any DUnit2-related > material on the trunk. > My concern was disrupting anybody working off the head - but I guess that's > life on the bleeding edge... > > Cheer, Paul. > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Mark Edington (Embarcadero) < > med...@us...> wrote: > >> On 11/23/2009 2:24 AM, Kris Golko wrote: >> >> I suggest we _tag_ the source after Embarcadero changes are complete. >> Then, we can procede with merging DUnit2 changes. >> >> I don't see a point in branching, as we don't need to develop two source >> streams. A tag can be used as a brach if such need arises. >> >> >> I don't have any other changes to commit from Embarcadero at this time. >> >> I'm inclined to agree with Kris about using a tag for DUnit1 instead of >> branching to do the DUnit2 the merge. It'll be less work that way and also >> keep the important change history on the trunk. >> >> Mark >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 >> 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus >> on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> _______________________________________________ >> Dunit-interest mailing list >> Dun...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint > What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? > Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first > _______________________________________________ > Dunit-interest mailing list > Dun...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dunit-interest > > |
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X