| 
     
      
      
      From: Andrea A. <an...@su...> - 2000-12-19 21:18:18
      
     
   | 
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 12:48:30PM -0800, ty...@va... wrote: > programs, it's probably more of a personal comfort issue of which you > think feels better to you. I dislike to see the explicit LFS interface. I like not having to write O_LARGEFILE and truncate64 in the sources for example. This because on 64bit platform I can avoid to compile with --enable-largefile and the source code remains the same: without alien things like O_LARGEFILE and truncate64 inside. About trustlevel of glibc folks I believe they're forced to get this interface right on the long run (unfortunately). Now that we have this stuff supported I can at least take advantage of it at the source level. About the librarians issue I'm not sure (what matters for the ABI is the interface [not if the library internally recalls truncate or truncate64 in its way while doing its work] and none librarians other than glibc is supposed to provide those VFS calls so interface shouldn't break that easily). But as said I'm not sure about this... Andrea  |