Re: [Dump-users] Segfault in restore 0.4b43

[Kenneth P. <sh...@se...>]

--On Sunday, December 05, 2010 10:00 PM -0800 Kenneth Porter 
<sh...@se...> wrote:

> It looks like the skipped test is trying to avoid a buffer overrun, so a
> more comprehensive fix that correctly acquires the buffer size is still
> needed.

Stelian,

I'm guessing you're swamped in other work. If you can coach me on what was 
intended and where to look for how that structure gets populated, I might 
be able to go back and fix the underlying issue.